Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBN] SP request for 11bn MAC

Thread Links	Date Links
Thread Prev	Thread Next	Thread Index	Date Prev	Date Next	Date Index

Hi Alfred,

Can you help to add the following SP in the queue?

Do you support the following for security in seamless roaming?

when a non-AP MLD is in the process of roaming from the current AP MLD to a target AP MLD, the same PMKSA is used to communicate with the current AP MLD and the target AP MLD

Supporting list: 24/0052, 23/1884, 23/1996, 24/830, 24/0083, 24/0101, 24/0396, 24/0655, 23/2157

Best,

Po-Kai

From: Cariou, Laurent <laurent.cariou@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, November 11, 2024 8:13 PM
To: STDS-802-11-TGBN@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBN] SP request for 11bn MAC

Hi Alfred,

Please add the following SP to the queue as well:

Do you agree to add to the 11bn SFD:

Periodic unavailability announcements from a STA are performed in UHR with enhancing the P2P TWT mechanism.

[23-2002]

Thanks,

Laurent

From: Cariou, Laurent <laurent.cariou@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, November 11, 2024 1:20 PM
To: STDS-802-11-TGBN@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [STDS-802-11-TGBN] SP request for 11bn MAC

Hi Alfred,

Please queue the following SPs to the MAC queue for NPCA:

Do you support that the event that triggers switching to the NPCA primary channel shall be

OBSS Control frame exchange (e.g., (MU-)RTS/CTS) or
OBSS HE/EHT/UHR PPDU

[24/0495r0]

Do you support that the NPCA operation shall use the same EDCA parameters ((MU) EDCA Parameter Set, EPCS EDCA Parameters), on both the BSS primary channel and the NPCA primary channel.

]24/0495r0]

Please queue the following SPs to the MAC queue for Coex:

Do you support that a non-AP STA that is a TXOP responder can indicate in a response frame 1) for how long it will be available, if known and/or 2) whether it will be unavailable after a specific point in time and, if known, for how long

the response frame is a Multi-STA BlockAck frame sent by the non-AP STA in response to the initial control frame or to MPDUs that solicit an immediate response

[23-2002]

Do you support that a non-AP STA can request its associated AP to initiate TXOPs/frame exchanges with the STA with an initial control frame that enables the non-AP STA to include unavailability feedback in the initial response frame?

[23-2002]

Please queue the following SP for power save to the MAC queue:

Do you support that if a UHR non-AP MLD operates in the eMLSR mode, then its associated UHR AP MLD, that supports transmitting intermediate FCS, shall include an intermediate FCS, if needed by the non-AP MLD, in every Initial Control Frames for eMLSR transmitted to the non-AP MLD through its affiliated APs on the eMLSR links?

Mandatory/optional support for transmitting intermediate FCS is TBD
The field that carries the Intermediate FCS shall be designed to be ignored by legacy STAs if they are scheduled in the same initial control frame
Note: intermediate FCS may not be needed, for instance, if the STA requires no padding. It is TBD whether an intermediate FCS can be avoided if a MIC is present.

[24-1227r1]

Thanks,

Laurent

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Corporation SAS (French simplified joint stock company)
Registered headquarters: 90-92 route de la Reine, 92100 Boulogne, France
Registration Number: 302 456 199 R.C.S. NANTERRE
Capital: 5 208 026.16 Euros

This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBN list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBN&A=1