Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBN] PDT-PHY-COBF

Thread Links	Date Links
Thread Prev	Thread Next	Thread Index	Date Prev	Date Next	Date Index

Hi Leonardo,

Thank you for the comments. In regards to your comment on the sentence below, are you asking if each AP can have a different method? The answer is yes, different implementers may use different algorithms.

The respective methods used by the beamformers to calculate the portions of the steering matrix Q_k are implementation specific.

Thanks,

Ron

From: Leonardo Lanante <llanante@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2024 7:59 AM
To: Ron Porat <ron.porat@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; STDS-802-11-TGBN@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [STDS-802-11-TGBN] PDT-PHY-COBF

Hi Ron,

Thank you for your efforts. Please check the 3 comments in the attached file.

Thanks,

Leonardo

From: Ron Porat <000009a0da80e877-dmarc-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2024 2:09 PM
To: STDS-802-11-TGBN@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [STDS-802-11-TGBN] PDT-PHY-COBF

Hi all,

I uploaded the first draft of this PDT in https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/24/11-24-2015-00-00bn-pdt-phy-cobf.docx

Many thanks to Sameer and You-Wei and the other reviewers and contributors who helped get to a first draft.

This PDT is limited to COBF PHY aspects that reside in the PHY section 38.xx . Other aspects related to e.g. sounding or NDPA that are described in sections 37.xx or others will go to other PDTs.

Since the TTT assignment for COBF includes both PHY and MAC I’m not sure I captured all the people that volunteered for the PHY part. If you don’t see your name please email me (privately).

Comments are welcome.

Thanks,

Ron

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBN list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBN&A=1