Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
I continue to assert that this sentence is a statement of intent that does not belong in the spec (otherwise the spec would be full of such noble but empty statements). We should balance the impact of PEDCA on existing devices by specific spec text, not by saying we should/expect to do so. I would also suggest that low latency traffic buffered to the transmit queue of AC_VO is a bit verbose and should be just low latency AC_VO traffic Thanks, Mark --
Mark RISON, Standards Architect, WLAN English/Esperanto/Français Samsung Cambridge Solution Centre Tel: +44 1223 434600 1 Cambridge Square, Cambridge CB4 0AE Fax: +44 1223 434601 ROYAUME UNI WWW:
http://www.samsung.com/uk From: Akhmetov, Dmitry <Dmitry.Akhmetov@xxxxxxxxx>
Greetings everyone, I did not received any comments in this thread regarding P-EDCA PDT document that was presented last week. So far the only concern I’m aware about is a last sentence which is “The P-EDCA mechanism
That sentence cover a bullet in the motion text. I expect more details to follow as we pass more SPs and motions. Just a note – this is very high level text that mainly act as a placeholder in draft 0.1.
Please let me know if you have comments or questions. Dmitry From: Akhmetov, Dmitry
Greetings everyone, This is the thread to start discussion on the Prioritized EDCA , P-EDCA (formerly known as HiP EDCA) . The initial version of the proposed draft text document can be found here: https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/24/11-24-2007-00-00bn-pdt-mac-p-edca.docx Dmitry To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBN list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBN&A=1 To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBN list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBN&A=1 |