Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBN] PDT-PHY-COBF

Thread Links	Date Links
Thread Prev	Thread Next	Thread Index	Date Prev	Date Next	Date Index

Hi Insik,

Thank you , will update in r2.

On GI+LTF – we wanted to keep signaling at 1bit and avoid the option that is not used in EHT (4x LTF). Agree it should be SP.

Regards,

Ron

From: Insik Jung/IoT Connectivity Standard TP <insik0618.jung@xxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2024 9:52 PM
To: STDS-802-11-TGBN@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBN] PDT-PHY-COBF

Hi Ron,

Thank you for your efforts. I'd like to attach my comments.

Best regards,

Insik Jung

LG ELECTRONICS

보낸 사람: Qinglai Liu <qinglai.liu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
보낸 날짜: 2024년 12월 13일 금요일 오후 12:17
받는 사람: STDS-802-11-TGBN@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <STDS-802-11-TGBN@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
제목: Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBN] PDT-PHY-COBF

Hi Ron,

Thanks for addressing all the comments. I have an editorial comment regarding r1.

In 38.3.20.4, “COBF transmissions are defined only for a UHR AP that can transmit at least 4 or more spatial streams.”

I think “at least” should be removed.

Best Regards,

Qinglai

Panasonic

From: Ron Porat <000009a0da80e877-dmarc-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, December 13, 2024 3:44 AM
To: STDS-802-11-TGBN@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBN] PDT-PHY-COBF

Hi Wook bong, Qinglai, Leonardo, Xiaogang, Jay, All,

Thank you for all the good comments received so far. I reviewed all of them and addressed what I thought should be fixed based also on further discussions with some of the other contributors. Uploaded r1 for your review.

One comment – section 38.3.20.1 contains non-normative text, prefer to keep it simple and not go into a tutorial of this topic’s theory.

Regards,

Ron

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBN list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBN&A=1