Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBN] PDT-MAC P-EDCA

"should" is used to introduce a recommendation on implementations.

Exactly what recommendation are you proposing here, Mohamed?

 

I have the following comments on r1:

 

- "EDCA channel access protocol" -- the CA in EDCA is channel access,

so we have enhanced distributed channel access channel access protocol.

And I'm not sure it's a protocol anyway ("channel access protocol" and

"EDCA protocol" do not appear in me/D7.0).  What was wrong with

"EDCA mechanism" (which appears more than 20 times in me/D7.0)?

 

- "worst case" should be "worst-case"

 

- "reduces worst case access delay" is missing "the"

 

- "an UHR" should be "a UHR"

 

Thanks,

 

Mark

 

--

Mark RISON, Standards Architect, WLAN   English/Esperanto/Français

Samsung Cambridge Solution Centre       Tel: +44 1223  434600

1 Cambridge Square, Cambridge CB4 0AE   Fax: +44 1223  434601

ROYAUME UNI                             WWW: http://www.samsung.com/uk

 

From: Mohamed Abouelseoud <mohamed.a.abouelseoud@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, 19 December 2024 15:43
To: STDS-802-11-TGBN@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBN] PDT-MAC P-EDCA

 

Hi Dmitry,

Thanks for working on the PDT and for the update. 

I think that the sentence about the effect on legacy approved in the motion is better than the one currently updated. I am not sure what is expected to means., “Should" is the common word we use for expected behavior. Also, I would keep it with the description text not move it to an editor note!

Thanks,

Mohamed

 



On Dec 17, 2024, at 5:37 PM, Akhmetov, Dmitry <Dmitry.Akhmetov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

 

Greetings all,

 

Thank you for submitted comments.

 

Revision 1 is now on mentor:

 

 

Please use this thread to provide additional comments/suggestion you may have.

 

Thank you,

Dmitry

 

 

From: Akhmetov, Dmitry
Sent: Monday, December 2, 2024 10:07 AM
To: STDS-802-11-TGBN@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: PDT-MAC P-EDCA

 

Greetings everyone,

 

This is the thread to start discussion on the Prioritized EDCA , P-EDCA (formerly known as HiP EDCA) .

The initial version of the proposed draft text document can be found here:

 

 

Dmitry 

 

 

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBN list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBN&A=1 

 

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBN list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBN&A=1

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBN list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBN&A=1