Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
Thanks Abhi, Yes, I remember this.
I thought it should be something like, … by enabling coordination between APs that do not *even* belong to the same ESS … , so that it is extended from the current limitation.
tomo From: Abhishek Patil <appatil@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Hi Tomo,
From: Tomo Adachi <tomo.adachi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
WARNING:
This email originated from outside of Qualcomm. Please be wary of any links or attachments, and do not enable macros. Hi Rubayet, Thanks for preparing the PDT for P2P.
Sorry to go back to the intention of the passed motion, but isn’t the restriction for the APs not belonging to the same ESS too strong?
It won’t allow to coordinate with the APs within the same ESS… Why not?
Best regards, tomo From: Rubayet Shafin <r.shafin@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Dear Fellow P2P TTT, With the motion on peer-to-peer (P2P) communication passing, I volunteer to be the PoC of the P2P topic.
Please find attached a PDT draft that I initiated, including all TTT members in 11-24/1698r14 in the author list. Your support and comments are appreciated! Hi Alfred, Upon TTT members' support, we plan to queue document 11-25/0088r0 (PDT MAC P2P) for presentation/SP/motion
in the January Interim, trying our best to make it to D0.1. Could you please add it to the MAC queue? Best Rubayet To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBN list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBN&A=1
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBN list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBN&A=1 |