| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
| Hi Alfred, Please add my document 24/1899r0 to the list of supporting documents for the following SPs from Guogang and Dibakar: SP4 – Guogang Huang – QoS ( Result) Do you support to optionally include an QoS Map element within the SCS Response frame transmitted by the AP MLD to update the DSCP-to-UP mapping for UL if the following conditions are true? •the TID and the User Priority subfields of the Control Info field in the associated QoS Characteristics element are set to different values within 0~7 •the AP MLD and the non-AP MLD supports the QoS map operation Supporting documents: 24/2123r0 SP7 – Dibakar Das – QoS ( Result) Do you agree that UHR should allow more than two TIDs to be mapped to high priority ACs (i.e., VO or VI)? •Upto one TID for each AC currently assigned to BE and BK are remapped. •Those TIDs may be used dynamically (e.g., following an SCS flow setup). Supporting list: ?? Best regards, Abdel
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBN list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBN&A=1 |