| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
| Hi Alfred, Could you please add the following motion on LL Indication to the TGbn agenda for voting? TGbn Defines or improves an existing mechanism so that a non-AP STA that is a TXOP responder can indicate its buffered low latency traffic needs (for traffic from the TxOP responder to the TxOP Holder) in a control response frame. The TXOP holder should consider the indication in determining subsequent actions. Subsequent actions related to this indication are out of the scope of the standard. •Note: whether an AP can Indicate its low latency needs is TBD Supporting documents : 24/0389r0, 24/168r0,24-0416/r1, 24-0442/r3, 24-1195/r1, 23/885, 24/264, 23/1886, 24/1156, 24/1871r1, 24/1074, 23/1909r1, 24/131r0, 24/1156r0 SP results (192Y, 10N, 29A) Thanks, Mohamed Abouelseoud To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBN list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBN&A=1 |