Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
We've recently had presentations on the threats to crypto presented by quantum computers. DH is, as I understand it, vulnerable to quantum computer attacks. Is it a good idea to use DH here? Are we assuming that the data exposed by any crack of the DHss is not sensitive enough to worry about for some reason? Thanks, Mark --
Mark RISON, Standards Architect, WLAN English/Esperanto/Français Samsung Cambridge Solution Centre Tel: +44 1223 434600 1 Cambridge Square, Cambridge CB4 0AE Fax: +44 1223 434601 ROYAUME UNI WWW:
http://www.samsung.com/uk From: Chittabrata Ghosh <chitta.ghosh@xxxxxxxxx>
Hi Alfred, Could you please add the following to the Motions for MAC? Move to add the following to the 11bn SFD •TBD request frame initiating roaming preparation carries the DH parameter element of the non-AP
MLD when new PTK is derived •TBD response frame during roaming preparation carries DH parameter element generated by the target AP MLD when
new PTK is derived •Non-AP MLD and the target AP MLD derive the PTK based on the shared PMK and DHss in
TBD request and TBD response frames? Supporting list: [24/1882, 24/1883] Result: No objection Regards, Chitto On Wed, Mar 12, 2025 at 6:08 PM Giovanni Chisci <00002b657bbbbed7-dmarc-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBN list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBN&A=1 To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBN list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBN&A=1 |