Hi Abhi,
Thank you for the preparing the CR document.
One question and some editorial suggestions.
The question is whether we want to use the term “the reported AP belongs to the same SMD”, in 11be, we use terms such as “AP affiliated with an AP MLD”, should we keep using the term “affiliated with”?
The editorial change is in the sentence below:
[3852]The Ultra High Reliability subfield is set to 1 to indicate that the AP represented by this BSSID (reported AP) is a UHR AP and that the UHR Capabilities element (or UHR Operation element), if included
as a subelement in the report, is identical in content to the UHR Capabilities element (or UHR Operation element) that the reported AP includes in
the Beacon frames it transmits. Otherwise, the Ultra High Reliability subfield is set to 0.
Also the phrase “(or UHR Operation element)”, is the parenthesis needed? I think we should delete the parenthesis.
Xiaofei Clement Wang
Principal Engineer | InterDigital
T: (631) 622.4028
From: Mark Rison <m.rison@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, March 28, 2025 1:27 PM
To: STDS-802-11-TGBN@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBN] TGbn MAC/PHY Teleconference of Monday, 24 March 2025
Hello Abhi,
Thanks. I now realise that I just got confused by how Word showed it:
I should have counted bits!
Thanks,
Mark
--
Mark RISON, Standards Architect, WLAN English/Esperanto/Français
Samsung Cambridge Solution Centre Tel: +44 1223 434600
1 Cambridge Square, Cambridge CB4 0AE Fax: +44 1223 434601
ROYAUME UNI WWW:
http://www.samsung.com/uk
From: Abhishek Patil <appatil@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, 28 March 2025 16:49
To: Mark Rison <m.rison@xxxxxxxxxxx>;
STDS-802-11-TGBN@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: robert.stacey@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [STDS-802-11-TGBN] TGbn MAC/PHY Teleconference of Monday, 24 March 2025
Hi Mark,
Thank you for reviewing the doc and providing suggestions to improve it. I have fixed all the items you highlighted. Please find attached revised version. I am yet to post this to mentor.
Regarding your question on usage of B21-B22 in NR IE – I was using B23-24. Did your version show otherwise?
Regards,
Abhi
From: Mark Rison <m.rison@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, March 28, 2025 7:26 AM
To: Abhishek Patil <appatil@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>;
STDS-802-11-TGBN@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: robert.stacey@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [STDS-802-11-TGBN] TGbn MAC/PHY Teleconference of Monday, 24 March 2025
WARNING:
This email originated from outside of Qualcomm. Please be wary of any links or attachments, and do not enable macros.
Thanks for this, Abhi. Some comments:
- "an UHR" should be "a UHR"
- If 9.4.2.35 is the first use of "SMD" it will need expanding
- "Extremely Ultra High Reliability" is going to be Wi-Fi 9, I presume.
Suggest deleting "Extremely "
- "the AP represented by this BSSID (reported AP)" -- why this convoluted
formulation for RNR? The baseline just has "reported AP" for the other bits
- You're using B21 and B22 of the BSSID Information field but in the
baseline I see B22 as being the DMG Positioning bit. [Is this field under
ANA control (it should be!)?]
- Spurious space in "UHR -MCS" (4x)
Thanks,
Mark
--
Mark RISON, Standards Architect, WLAN English/Esperanto/Français
Samsung Cambridge Solution Centre Tel: +44 1223 434600
1 Cambridge Square, Cambridge CB4 0AE Fax: +44 1223 434601
ROYAUME UNI WWW:
http://www.samsung.com/uk
From: Abhishek Patil <0000297b717f2a04-dmarc-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, 27 March 2025 15:52
To: STDS-802-11-TGBN@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBN] TGbn MAC/PHY Teleconference of Monday, 24 March 2025
Hi Alfred,
Can you please help queue the following CR doc to TGbn MAC agenda?
Hi All,
Could you please review the document and let me know if you have any suggestions? The document resolves 6 comments in clause 9.
Regards,
Abhi
From: Alfred Asterjadhi <asterjadhi@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2025 4:42 PM
To: STDS-802-11-TGBN@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [STDS-802-11-TGBN] TGbn MAC/PHY Teleconference of Monday, 24 March 2025
WARNING:
This email originated from outside of Qualcomm. Please be wary of any links or attachments, and do not enable macros.
Hello all,
We have a MAC/PHY teleconference scheduled for Monday 24 March 2025, and I am finalizing the agenda (planned to be posted tomorrow). Currently there is only one PHY submission in the queue so I would like to ask members to send me additional
requests for PHY CR submissions asap and no later than tomorrow, Friday 17:00 ET.
This way we can use the teleconferences in an efficient way and start the comment resolution process.
Guidelines for scheduled PHY conf calls:
· Members are invited to send submission requests
to be added to the PHY submissions queue.
· Requests may explicitly indicate if the requestor prefers to discuss his/her submission
at a particular PHY conf call. If there is no such explicit indication then the submission will be added by default to the PHY submissions queue and will be scheduled for presentation in a subsequent PHY conference call during which there are at least 3 submissions
available for discussion.
· A scheduled PHY conference call will be cancelled if the planned PHY agenda for that particular
conference call does not have at least 3 queued presentations or at least one queued presentation with an explicit request.
Regards,
Alfred
--
Alfred Asterjadhi, PhD
IEEE802.11 TGbe/TGbn Chair,
Qualcomm Technologies Inc.
Cell #: +1 858 263 9445
Office #: +1 858 658 5302
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBN list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBN&A=1
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBN list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBN&A=1
|
|
|
|
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBN list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBN&A=1
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBN list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBN&A=1