Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBN] TGbn Motion & SP request



Hi Alfred,

 

Could you please add the following passed SP to motion?

 

Move to approve resolutions to the CIDs(1C):

1783 in 11-25/0537r3

and incorporate the text changes into the latest TGbn draft.

 

Note: the corresponding straw poll gets no objection.

 

BR,

Chaoming

 

发件人: Alice Jialing Li Chen <jialing.li.phd2@xxxxxxxxx>
发送时间: 2025年5月15日 16:28
收件人: STDS-802-11-TGBN@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
主题: Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBN] TGbn Motion & SP request

 

Hi Alfred,

 

Could you please add the following passed SP to motion?

 

•         M4: Move to add the following to 11bn SFD

–        The Number of UHR-SIG Symbols in CoBF transmission is equal to the minimum number of UHR-SIG symbols needed to accommodate the UHR-SIG information

•         No extra UHR-SIG symbols will be allowed

•         Supporting doc: 11-25/842r1

No objection

 

Regards,

Alice

 

 

On Thu, May 15, 2025 at 3:10 AM Alice Jialing Li Chen <jialing.li.phd2@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi Alfred,

 

Could you please add the following passed SPs to the PM2 motion list?

 

•         M1: Move to add the following to 11bn SFD

–        Use fixed values for the following fields in the CoBF transmission

•         UHR-SIG MCS is fixed to MCS0

•         Spatial Reuse is fixed to ‘PSR_AND_NON_SRG_OBSS_PD_PROHIBITED’

•         LDPC Extra Symbol Segment is fixed to 1

•         PE Disambiguity is fixed to 1

•         Interference Mitigation is fixed to ‘Disable’

•         Supporting doc: 11-25/842r1, 11-25/389r2, 11-25/399r1, 11-25/401r0

No objection

 

•         M2: Move to add the following to 11bn SFD

–        The Bandwidth and Punctured Channel Information indication in the CoBF Invite and Sync frames are the same with the following rules:

•         When the static puncturing patterns of the two APs are the same, the puncturing information in the invite and sync frames corresponds to that

•         If the static puncturing patterns of the two APs are not the same, the sharing AP will need to reduce to a smaller BW in which the two APs have the same puncturing pattern, and the information in the invite and sync frames will correspond to that reduced BW configuration

•         Note: Indication format is TBD

•         Supporting doc: 11-25/842r1

No objection

 

•         M3: Move to add the following to 11bn SFD

–        The indicated GI+LTF Size (for the COBF transmission) in the CoBF Invite and Sync frames is the same

•         GI+LTF size indication format is TBD

•         Supporting doc: 11-25/842r1

119Y/26N/82A

 

Could you please add the following SP to the PM2 session?

•         SP4: Do you agree to add the following to 11bn SFD?

–        The Number of UHR-SIG Symbols in CoBF transmission is equal to the minimum number of UHR-SIG symbols needed to accommodate the UHR-SIG information

•         No extra UHR-SIG symbols will be allowed

•         Supporting doc: 11-25/842r1

 

Regards,

Alice

 

 

On Thu, May 15, 2025 at 1:13 AM Alice Jialing Li Chen <jialing.li.phd2@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi Alfred,

 

I presented 11-25/842r0 in the last TGbn PHY call in the May Interim. No time to run 4 SPs in the PHY call. Just uploaded the latest 11-25/842r1. May I run the following SPs in the Joint call if time permits?

 

•         SP1: Do you agree to add the following to 11bn SFD?

–        Use fixed values for the following fields in the CoBF transmission

•         UHR-SIG MCS is fixed to MCS0

•         Spatial Reuse is fixed to ‘PSR_AND_NON_SRG_OBSS_PD_PROHIBITED’

•         LDPC Extra Symbol Segment is fixed to 1

•         PE Disambiguity is fixed to 1

•         Interference Mitigation is fixed to ‘Disable’

•         Supporting doc: 11-25/842r1, 11-25/389r2, 11-25/399r1, 11-25/401r0

 

•         SP2: Do you agree to add the following to 11bn SFD?

–        The Bandwidth and Punctured Channel Information indication in the CoBF Invite and Sync frames are the same with the following rules:

•         When the static puncturing patterns of the two APs are the same, the puncturing information in the invite and sync frames corresponds to that

•         If the static puncturing patterns of the two APs are not the same, the sharing AP will need to reduce to a smaller BW in which the two APs have the same puncturing pattern, and the information in the invite and sync frames will correspond to that reduced BW configuration

•         Note: Indication format is TBD

•         Supporting doc: 11-25/842r1

 

•         SP3: Do you agree to add the following to 11bn SFD?

–        The indicated GI+LTF Size (for the COBF transmission) in the CoBF Invite and Sync frames is the same

•         GI+LTF size indication format is TBD

•         Supporting doc: 11-25/842r1

 

•         SP4: Do you agree to add the following to 11bn SFD?

–        The Number of UHR-SIG Symbols in CoBF transmission is equal to the minimum number of UHR-SIG symbols needed to accommodate the UHR-SIG information

•         No extra UHR-SIG symbols will be allowed

•         Supporting doc: 11-25/842r1

 

Regards,

Alice Chen

Qualcomm


To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBN list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBN&A=1


To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBN list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBN&A=1