Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
Hi Jonghoe and Rubayet, Thanks for sharing this P2P PDT. I have one comment regarding the 37.16.1.3 Non-AP STA behavior. In the last paragraph of page 9, “the non-AP STA … may initiate an EDCA backoff procedure for the transmission of one or more non-TB PPDUs …”. If non-AP STA use EDCA backoff procedure here, which means the channel may be idle for a while, so how to make sure that the current TXOP not be contended by other STAs? Best regards, Pei Zhou TCL 发件人: Jonghoe Koo <jh89.koo@xxxxxxxxxxx> Hi Alfred, Could you please indicate in the agenda that this document (P2P PDT doc 11-25/764) resolves 14 CIDs when adding it to the agenda? The Abstract text box in the cover sheet of the uploaded document seems to be positioned in a way that obscures the list of CIDs that the document aims to address. As attached, this document proposes resolutions for following 14 CIDs as part of CC50 comments: 229, 230, 849, 875 876, 1997, 2078, 2167, 2521, 2573, 3113, 3129, 3130, 3621 Dear all, As shared by Rubayet and as described in the revision history of this document, we have made efforts to reflect as many technical comments as possible that we have received after the first version of the P2P PDT document was shared. As part of these effort, numerous parts have been modified or removed. We kindly request that members actively share your feedbacks on the revised contents as well, so that the document can undergo sufficient offline discussions and revisions before it is discussed. Any editorial and/or technical comments would be greatly appreciated. Regards, Jonghoe KOO Communications Standards Research Team, Samsung Research Samsung Electronics From: Rubayet Shafin <r.shafin@xxxxxxxxxxx> Hi Alfred, Could you please add P2P PDT doc 11-25/764 to the MAC queue for SP? Dear P2P TTTs, Hope you all are doing well. I wanted to share some updates on the P2P PDT. Based on extensive discussions and feedback received from numerous members, either offline, online, or F2F (thanks to you all!), I have made significant changes to address the comments. One major change is that provisioning-related procedures have been entirely removed from the TXSPG for simplicity and ease of implementation. On the other hand, the Co-CR is now harmonized with the MAPC framework PDT. A summary of the changes is as follows— TXSPG--
Co-CR:
The revised PDT can be found here and is also attached. I would appreciate it if you could review the document and let me know whether you have any comments on the revised PDT. Best Rubayet To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBN list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBN&A=1
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBN list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBN&A=1 To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBN list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBN&A=1 |