| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
|
Hi Inoue, Thank you for your email. Both the comments are asking to add the word ‘field’ after the field name hence the resolution is same for both.
Please let me know if your comment is pointing to some other issue. Regards, From: INOUE Kyosuke <kyosuke_inoue@mail.sharp>
WARNING:
This email originated from outside of Qualcomm. Please be wary of any links or attachments, and do not enable macros. Hi Abhi, Thank you for preparing CR. I've checked 25/1905, and I found that my CID 6031 and Jarkko's one 6871 are captured in both your CR and Duncan's CR 25/1960. However the proposed resolutions are different between them as below. Both CIDs are assigned to you according to 802tools. In this case, which one should be treated as comment resolution for these CIDs? 25/1905
25/1960
Best regards, Kyosuke (SHARP CORPORATION) 差出人:
Abhishek Patil <0000297b717f2a04-dmarc-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Hi Roaming TTT members, Doc
1905 resolves 7 CIDs related to Max Number Of Prepared Target AP MLDs field.
The resolutions are pretty straightforward.
Could you please take a look and let me know if you have any feedback? Hi Alfred, Jeongki, Srini, Xiaofei,
Regards, To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBN list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBN&A=1 To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBN list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBN&A=1 |