Hello Abhi,
As far as I can tell, you have still not explained what
"Values carried in the respective counter and type fields remains unchanged"
means.
Would you be kind enough to use some other words to explain this,
please? What respective counter? What type fields?
[Also, for consistency I think
Duration equals the value carried in the Update Indication In TIM Interval field
should be
Duration specified in the Update Indication In TIM Interval field
]
Thanks,
Mark
--
Mark RISON, Standards Architect, WLAN English/Esperanto/Français
Samsung Cambridge Solution Centre Tel: +44 1223 434600
1 Cambridge Square, Cambridge CB4 0AE Fax: +44 1223 434601
ROYAUME UNI WWW:
http://www.samsung.com/uk
From: Abhishek Patil <0000297b717f2a04-dmarc-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, 12 November 2025 11:13
To: STDS-802-11-TGBN@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBN] 11bn LB291 CR request
Hi Binita,
I’ve spent considerable time implementing multiple rounds of revisions, and it seems there are still ongoing requests for further changes. Since you
have a clear vision of what you’d like to see, I think it would be most effective for you to make any additional adjustments directly. I have posted the Visio file for figure 37-8 to mentor (here).
This version has been updated to satisfy the comments from Mark. Please make the changes you have in mind and please share the updated figure to the reflector so that members can review and provide their suggestions.
If you prefer, I can reassign the CIDs to you.
Regards,
Abhi
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBN list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBN&A=1