| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
|
Hi Ming, Ross and all, During the Joint Conf. Call in Jan. 29 (10:00?12:00 ET), Ming presented document 26/0020 ,which included adding “ing” after “switch” for
“NPCA Switch Delay” and “NPCA Switch Back Delay” fields in the NPCA Operation Parameters field within the UHR Operation element. However, I noticed that the Mode Specific Parameters for NPCA field in the UHR Parameters Update element and the UHR Mode Change element still uses "NPCA switch (back) delay" without the "-ing"
suffix. Moreover, due to the previous naming convention, Clause 37 currently uses a mix of terms:
“NPCA switching delay” and
“NPCA switch back delay.” To ensure clarity and uniformity across the draft, should we align all instances to use (or not use) the
“-ing” form? Or has there been an offline discussion I may have missed regarding the preferred naming convention?
I did a global search in D1.2 by using "NPCA switch" as the keyword, hoping it will be helpful to our editor.
BR, Yingqiao Quan Communication Standards Devision
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBN list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBN&A=1 |