| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
|
Hi Giovanni, Thank you for your document. I do not have strong opinion about the modified specification text : One rematch: maybe “the
same R-TWT schedule as the schedule as announced” by Coordinating AP would better be “a R-TWT schedule
corresponding to the schedule as announced”. This is because the TSF are not the same. While I agree there may exist protection mechanism for Co-RTWT in coordinated BSS, I disagree with the example you provide of using Quiet Element for protecting Co-RTWT. There are several reasons that avoid using Quiet Element to align, in a second BSS, with a TWT SP of a first BSS :
I suggest removing the Quiet Element example from the comment resolution tab. Best regards, Pascal From: Giovanni Chisci <00002b657bbbbed7-dmarc-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[Co-RTWT TTT - document ready for presentation] Dear Co-RTWT TTT and Alfred, I uploaded the contribution Co-RTWT part 7 resolving the following 20 CIDs: 4907 5826 5827 6750 7975 7976 8150 8362 8364 8367 8368 9340 9383 9504 10992 10994 11402 11403 12109 12258 The document is ready for presentation,
@Alfred Asterjadhi, could you please queue it for presentation? To the Co-RTWT TTT, please check resolutions and let me know if you have comments. Best, Giovanni To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBN list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBN&A=1 To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBN list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBN&A=1 |