Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBN] Feedback Request: Co-RTWT CR Presentation 26/0486r0



Hi SunHee,

 

Thanks for the contribution.

I prefer option 2 because it is more precise in case that there are more than one scheme in the MAPC Negotiation frame (request).

 

BR,

 

Xiangxin Gu

Institute of Communication Technology

 

From: SunHee Baek <sunhee.baek@xxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, June 24, 2026 12:59 PM
To: STDS-802-11-TGBN@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [STDS-802-11-TGBN] Feedback Request: Co-RTWT CR Presentation 26/0486r0

 

Hello everyone,

 

I presented the 26/0486r0, which proposes a rejection reason for Co-RTWT negotiation, during the TGbn MAC teleconference on June 22.

Please refer to the attached file for the details.

 

This document describes how the MAPC responding AP can indicate the reason for rejecting the RTWT schedule requested by the MAPC initiating AP through a new field. This indication may help the initiating AP better understanding the rejection reason and adjust the requested RTWT schedule accordingly in a subsequent negotiation.

The new field may be defined in either of the following ways:

  • Option 1: in the MAPC Request Control field of the Co-RTWT profile

n   Based on Giovannis comment, Option 1 is applicable only when the MAPC Scheme Type field is set to 3 (Co-RTWT scheme) same as Option 2. So, the normative text in 37.14.1.4 (MAPC agreement negotiation) will be removed in next version of 26/0486.

  • Option 2: in MAPC Per-Scheme Info field of the Co-RTWT profile

The name and length of the new field are open for further discussion. (Kiseon recommended Rejection Reason Code field.)

 

At this stage, I am considering Option 1 as the baseline approach. However, I would appreciate your feedback on whether Option 1 is appropriate or if Option 2 would be preferable.

 

If you have any comments, questions or a preference between option 1 and option 2, please let me know.

Looking forward to hearing from you.

 

Best Regards

SunHee Baek

 


To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBN list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBN&A=1


To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBN list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBN&A=1