Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBN] MAC CR 11-26/1784 for CIDs about Entity ID



Hi Gaius,
Thanks for your detailed review and suggestion.
I agree with your interpretation and proposed wording. I have updated the paragraphs accordingly. 
Please let me know if you have any further comments.

Best Regards, 
Chun Huang



Original
From: GaiusYaoHuangWee <yaohuang.wee@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>  
To: 黄纯00351826;STDS-802-11-TGBN@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <STDS-802-11-TGBN@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>;  
Date: 2026年10月09日 15:01  
Subject: RE: [STDS-802-11-TGBN] MAC CR 11-26/1784 for CIDs about Entity ID  
Hi Chun Huang,
 
Thanks for preparing the CR.  
Regarding your proposed resolution for CID 15711 related to:
 
A MAPC initiating AP shall not include the AP ID field in the MAPC element carried in the transmitted MAPC negotiation request, unless the MAPC initiating AP and the MAPC responding AP do not have an established MAPC agreement for any one of the Co-BF, Co-SR, or Co-TDMA MAPC schemes and the MAPC initiating AP is requesting  to establish a new MAPC agreement for any one of the Co-BF, Co-SR, or Co-TDMA MAPC schemes by following the rules defined in 37.15.1.4.2 (MAPC agreement establishment).
 
My interpretation of this text is that it means the AP ID field can only be included when the conditions (following the “unless”) are met. It does not necessarily mean that the AP field shall be included when the conditions are met.

But I think you can modify the existing paragraph directly to address this:
 
A MAPC initiating AP shall not include the AP ID field in the MAPC element carried in the transmitted MAPC negotiation request, unless the MAPC initiating AP and the MAPC responding  AP do not have an established MAPC agreement for any one of the Co-BF, Co-SR, or Co-TDMA MAPC schemes and the MAPC initiating AP is requesting to establish a new MAPC agreement for any one of the Co-BF, Co-SR, or Co-TDMA MAPC schemes by following the rules  defined in 37.15.1.4.2 (MAPC agreement establishment), in which case the AP ID field shall be included.

If its fine, I would suggest a similar change for the paragraph after:
 
A MAPC responding AP shall not include the AP ID field in the MAPC element carried in the transmitted MAPC negotiation response, unless the MAPC initiating AP and the MAPC responding  AP do not have an established MAPC agreement for any one of the Co-BF, Co-SR, or Co-TDMA MAPC schemes and it is accepting a new MAPC agreement for any one of Co-BF, Co-SR, or Co-TDMA MAPC schemes by following the rules defined in 37.15.1.4.2 (MAPC agreement  establishment), in which case the AP ID field shall be included.
 
For your consideration.
 
Best regards,
Gaius
From: Chun Huang <huang.chun2@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, 9 October 2026 10:37 am
To: STDS-802-11-TGBN@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [STDS-802-11-TGBN] MAC CR 11-26/1784 for CIDs about Entity ID
 
Hi All,
Please find the comment resolutions for the CIDs related to Entity ID in 11-26/1784. Most of them are editorial.
If you have any comments, please let me know. Thanks.
 
 
Best Regards, 
Chun Huang

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBN list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBN&A=1


To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBN list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBN&A=1