Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBN] doc 1894r4, CIDs of Subclause 37.18.1 (Part-II)

Hi Shravan,

Please find my proposed changes below highlighted in blue for CID 19237.

  • The “however” part is not needed, since it does not conflict with the preceding sentence with NPCA operation for non-AP STA also constrained to operate within the BSS bandwidth.
  • I believe may -> might is already handled when you presented it.
  • CID tag for both deleted text and added text.

 

NOTE (#13650, 19237)35—While it is required that the NPCA operation is constrained to operate within the BSS bandwidth, there is no such constraint on a non-AP STA, i.e. a non-AP STA can have an operational bandwidth that is smaller than the BSS bandwidth and still potentially be capable of participation in NPCA operation, depending on device parameters and NPCA operational parameters. NPCA operation is constrained to operate within the BSS bandwidth. A non-AP STA, however, may might have an operational bandwidth that is smaller than the BSS bandwidth and may still be capable of participating in NPCA operation, depending on the device parameters and NPCA operational parameters.

 

Regards

Yongsen

 

From: Kalyankar Shravan Kumar <kalyankar.shravan.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2026 9:42 PM
To: STDS-802-11-TGBN@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Alfred Asterjadhi <aasterja@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Xiaofei.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: Yujian (Ross Yu) <ross.yujian@xxxxxxxxxx>; Lei Huang <lei.huang1@xxxxxxxxxx>; Motozuka Hiroyuki (本塚 裕幸) <motozuka.hiroyuki@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Yongsen Ma <yongsen.ma@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [STDS-802-11-TGBN] doc 1894r4, CIDs of Subclause 37.18.1 (Part-II)

 

Hi Alfred, Xiaofei, Can you please add me to the queue for SP (14 CIDs) on Doc 1894r4, CIDs: 17691, 18012, 17692, 14453, 20996, 19021, 21001, 20997, 20817, 19020, 18855, 17872, 17396, 13982 Hi All, Thanks for the feedback and comments on Doc

ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart

This Message Is From an External Sender

Use caution opening files, clicking links or responding to requests.

ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerEnd

 

Hi Alfred, Xiaofei,

 

Can you please add me to the queue for SP (14 CIDs) on Doc 1894r4,

  • CIDs: 17691, 18012, 17692, 14453, 20996, 19021, 21001, 20997, 20817, 19020, 18855, 17872, 17396, 13982

 

Hi All,

 

Thanks for the feedback and comments on Doc 1894. I have uploaded a revised document and removed deferred CIDs. Please let me know if you need any further changes.

 

11-Nov-2026 ET

2026

1894

4

TGbn

LB296 CR for CIDs of Subclause 37.18.1 (Part-II)

Shravan Kumar Kalyankar (Huawei)

11-Nov-2026 00:35:33 ET

Download, Revise

 

 

 

Regards

Shravan

 

From: Kalyankar Shravan Kumar
Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2026 8:48 AM
To: 'Yongsen Ma' <yongsen.ma@xxxxxxxxxxx>; STDS-802-11-TGBN@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: Yujian (Ross Yu) <ross.yujian@xxxxxxxxxx>; Lei Huang <lei.huang1@xxxxxxxxxx>; Motozuka Hiroyuki (本塚 裕幸) <motozuka.hiroyuki@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [STDS-802-11-TGBN] doc 1894r0, CIDs of Subclause 37.18.1 (Part-II)

 

Hi All,

 

Thanks for the offline comments. I have uploaded the 1894r2 with some minor revisions.

 

Hi Yongsen,

 

Thanks for the feedback. I think there is some confusion about the note number. Let me clarify it while I present the document today.

 

09-Nov-2026 ET

2026

1894

2

TGbn

LB296 CR for CIDs of Subclause 37.18.1 (Part-II)

Shravan Kumar Kalyankar (Huawei)

09-Nov-2026 20:44:18 ET

Download, Revise

 

Regards

Shravan

From: Yongsen Ma <yongsen.ma@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2026 8:09 AM
To: Kalyankar Shravan Kumar <kalyankar.shravan.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>; STDS-802-11-TGBN@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Motozuka Hiroyuki (本塚 裕幸) <motozuka.hiroyuki@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Yujian (Ross Yu) <ross.yujian@xxxxxxxxxx>; Lei Huang <lei.huang1@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [STDS-802-11-TGBN] doc 1894r0, CIDs of Subclause 37.18.1 (Part-II)

 

Hi Shravan,

 

Thanks for your work.

A minor correction request: CID 19237 is about NOTE 3 in D2.0, so the tag should be placed in the previous paragraph with (#13650, 19237); it is not closely related to CID #19014.

Also, seems like “NOTE 5” should be removed and “NOTE 6” changed to “NOTE 5”, since the added sentence contains normative text but not within NOTE 5.

 

Regards

Yongsen

 

From: Kalyankar Shravan Kumar <kalyankar.shravan.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, November 9, 2026 3:48 AM
To: STDS-802-11-TGBN@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Motozuka Hiroyuki (本塚 裕幸) <motozuka.hiroyuki@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Yongsen Ma <yongsen.ma@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Yujian (Ross Yu) <ross.yujian@xxxxxxxxxx>; Lei Huang <lei.huang1@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [STDS-802-11-TGBN] doc 1894r0, CIDs of Subclause 37.18.1 (Part-II)

 

Hi All, I have revised doc 1894 based on the offline discussions and uploaded 1894r1 (28 CIDs). Please look into it revised document and let me know if you have any further comments. 09-Nov-2026 ET 2026 1894 1 TGbn LB296 CR for CIDs of Subclause

ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart

This Message Is From an External Sender

Use caution opening files, clicking links or responding to requests.

ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerEnd

Hi All,

 

I have revised doc 1894 based on the offline discussions and uploaded 1894r1 (28 CIDs). Please look into it revised document and let me know if you have any further comments.

09-Nov-2026 ET

2026

1894

1

TGbn

LB296 CR for CIDs of Subclause 37.18.1 (Part-II)

Shravan Kumar Kalyankar (Huawei)

09-Nov-2026 06:43:03 ET

Download, Revise

 

 

Hi Hiroyuki,

 

Thanks for pointing out the typo (CID no.), I have corrected it.

 

Hi Yongsen,

 

Please go through Note – 6 in the revised document and let me know whether it address your comment.

 

Regards,

Shravan

 

From: Motozuka Hiroyuki (本塚 裕幸) <motozuka.hiroyuki@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, November 9, 2026 5:48 PM
To: Kalyankar Shravan Kumar <kalyankar.shravan.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>; STDS-802-11-TGBN@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Yujian (Ross Yu) <ross.yujian@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [STDS-802-11-TGBN] doc 1894r0, CIDs of Subclause 37.18.1 (Part-II)

 

Hi Shravan,

CC: Ross,

 

Thank you for sharing the CR. The CR document 26/1894r0 contains CID 19201 in the list on the cover page and #19201 tags in the proposed text changes, while the list of comments does not;  instead, it contains CID 19021. I wonder if 19201 was a typo of 19021 in this contribution.

(BTW, if the proposed resolution is removing both duplicated descriptions, the proposed resolution for CID19021 should be REVISED, rather than ACCEPTED.)

 

Ross,
CID19201 is assigned to Suhwook and the comment is "TXOP Return Support In TXSPG subfield" should be "TXOP Return Support”. But “Submission” in the comment database specifies 26/1893r1, which is Shravan’s CR part 1. I suspect 26/1893r1 might have contained the same typo noted above.

If Shravan agrees with this understanding, I would suggest checking the Submission, Status, and Resolution Status fields for CID19201 in the comment database. Thanks!

 

Best regards,

Hiroyuki

 

From: Kalyankar Shravan Kumar <00004444ef6d9ddc-dmarc-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, November 6, 2026 11:44 AM
To: STDS-802-11-TGBN@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [STDS-802-11-TGBN] doc 1894r0, CIDs of Subclause 37.18.1 (Part-II)

 

Hi All,

 

I have uploaded 1894r0 on the server.

 

https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/26/11-26-1894-00-00bn-lb296-cr-for-cids-of-subclause-37-18-1-part-ii.docx

This document addresses a total of 28 CIDs, including resolutions for 14 CIDs that were deferred during an earlier discussion of the 1893 document and have now been revised based on that feedback.

Please note that CID 14390 is temporarily deferred based on comments received offline.

Please review the document and let me know if you have any further comments.

Regards

Shravan

 

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBN list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBN&A=1

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBN list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBN&A=1