[STDS-802-11-TGM] https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/13/11-13-0233-06-00

Thread Links	Date Links
Thread Prev	Thread Next	Thread Index	Date Prev	Date Next	Date Index

Dear all,

Revision 6 of the comments spreadsheet: https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/13/11-13-0233-06-000m-revmc-wg-ballot-comments.xls

has been re-organized to allow easier identification of comments for motion.

There are now tabs per editorial comment group.

“Ready for motion – Reviewed” and “Ready for motion – Editorial” will come up for motion tomorrow.

Best Regards,

Adrian P STEPHENS

Tel: +44 (1793) 404 825

Tel: +44 (7920) 084 900

Tel: +1 (408) 239 7485

----------------------------------------------
Intel Corporation (UK) Limited
Registered No. 1134945 (England)
Registered Office: Pipers Way, Swindon SN3 1RJ
VAT No: 860 2173 47

From: Stephens, Adrian P
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2013 3:23 PM
To: STDS-802-11-TGM@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/13/11-13-0233-05-000m-revmc-wg-ballot-comments.xls uploaded

Dear 802.11mc folks,

I have uploaded https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/13/11-13-0233-05-000m-revmc-wg-ballot-comments.xls

This contains updates to comments owned by editor.

The status of the comments is:

Count			state
LB	Owning Ad-hoc	Comment Group	Unassigned	Needs submission	Review	Assigned	Resolution Drafted	Ready for Motion	Grand Total
193	EDITOR	Assigned to Mark Rison				12			12
		Draft mechanics		2			2		4
		Editorial		4		2	161	5	172
		Grammar - punctuation					10		10
		Invalid comments					3		3
		Language - ensure					22	4	26
		Language - setup					8		8
		MIB		2					2
		Normative language					45	2	47
		Style					1		1
		Style - caps	2	3			16	4	25
		Style - character code		3			1		4
		Style - commonality		6			1		7
		Style - consistency		18			1		19
		Style - equations		1					1
		Style - spacing		2					2
		Style - terminology		11			6	1	18
		Trivial Technical	1		1			17	19
	EDITOR Total		3	52	1	14	277	33	380
193 Total			3	52	1	14	277	33	380
Grand Total			3	52	1	14	277	33	380

The comments marked “ready for motion” have been approved by TGmc by straw poll, or where a direction

was approved and a resolution subsequently written.

The 277 comments marked “Resolution Drafted” are, I believe, non-controversial, with the exception of comment 1595, which

should be classified “discuss”.

I don’t propose to review these individually in TGmc. I will bring a motion at some time (yet to be determined by discussion in REVmc,

but it could be as early as tomorrow).

(These comments can be identified in the EDITOR tab, with Resn Status=non-blank and Ad-hoc Status blank).

Please let me know if you have any objection to any of these comments. I will mark any such comments “Discuss”.