| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
| --- This message came from the IEEE 802.11 Task Group M Technical Reflector ---
Hello Peter, > The comment: > There is a zoo of terminology: "operating [band]width", "channel [band]width", "operating channel width", "BSS operating width" (and probably other more esoteric forms) > […] > For a start: “BSS operating width” only appears in 10.16.12 and means “BSS operating channel width” (see 10.40.1), as does the S.5.1 “operating width” QED. (There are other "BSS blah width"s, e.g. "BSS channel width".) > Absent your effort to be more specific about stated and implied use of xxx”width” throughout the standard, > I propose to resolve CID 3386 with > REJECTED - The comment fails to identify a specific issue to be addressed. It fails to identify changes in sufficient detail so that the specific wording of the changes that will satisfy the commenter
can be determined. Since the comment identifies a specific issue to be addressed, and I propose to identify changes in sufficient detail so that the specific wording of the changes that will satisfy the commenter can be determined, I think this resolution is suboptimal. Regards, Mark -- Mark RISON, Standards Architect, WLAN English/Esperanto/Français Samsung Cambridge Solution Centre Tel: +44 1223 434600 Innovation Park, Cambridge CB4 0DS Fax: +44 1223 434601 ROYAUME UNI WWW: http://www.samsung.com/uk From: Peter Ecclesine (pecclesi) [mailto:pecclesi@xxxxxxxxx]
Hi Mark, The commenter should have “worked out all the things that need to be changed” before writing The comment: There is a zoo of terminology: "operating [band]width", "channel [band]width", "operating channel width", "BSS operating width" (and probably other more esoteric forms) Proposed resolution: Pick one term and humanely kill all the others For a start: “BSS operating width” only appears in 10.16.12 and means “BSS operating channel width” (see 10.40.1), as does the S.5.1 “operating width” Absent your effort to be more specific about stated and implied use of xxx”width” throughout the standard, I propose to resolve CID 3386 with REJECTED - The comment fails to identify a specific issue to be addressed. It fails to identify changes in sufficient detail so that the specific wording of the changes that will satisfy the commenter
can be determined. Best Regards, petere From: ***** IEEE stds-802-11-tgm List ***** [mailto:STDS-802-11-TGM@xxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Mark Rison --- This message came from the IEEE 802.11 Task Group M Technical Reflector ---
To resolve CID 3386, I propose to make the spec consistently use the following three terms: 1) "PPDU bandwidth": the bandwidth used to transmit the data in a PPDU (CH_BANDWIDTH for HT and VHT, for example; see also the
n MHz PPDU defintions in subclause 3.2) 2) "mask bandwidth": the bandwidth of the transmit mask for a PPDU transmission (called "transmit spectrum mask" or "transmit spectral mask" in most PHYs; DMG just calls it "transmit mask"; see also the
n MHz mask PPDU definitions in subclause 3.2) 3) "BSS bandwidth": the maximum PPDU bandwidth of transmissions in a BSS (currently called "BSS" followed by some random combination of one or more of "operating", "channel", "width", "bandwidth" and probably other things) Before I go and work out all the things which need to be changed, I would like to get agreement in principle on this terminology from the task group. I will ask for this in a (maybe the next) teleconf, but since these are often sparsely attended, if you have a preference but might not attend, you could tell me your preference in advance by email. Mark -- Mark RISON, Standards Architect, WLAN English/Esperanto/Français Samsung Cambridge Solution Centre Tel: +44 1223 434600 Innovation Park, Cambridge CB4 0DS Fax: +44 1223 434601 ROYAUME UNI WWW:
http://www.samsung.com/uk _______________________________________________________________________________
IF YOU WISH to be Removed from this reflector, PLEASE DO NOT send your request to this CLOSED reflector. We use this valuable tool to communicate on the issues at hand.
SELF SERVICE OPTION: Point your Browser to -
http://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGM and then amend your subscription on the form provided. If you require removal from the reflector press the LEAVE button.
Further information can be found at:
http://www.ieee802.org/11/Email_Subscribe.html _______________________________________________________________________________
IF YOU WISH to be Removed from this reflector, PLEASE DO NOT send your request to this CLOSED reflector. We use this valuable tool to communicate on the issues at hand. SELF SERVICE OPTION: Point your Browser to - http://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGM and then amend your subscription on the form provided. If you require removal from the reflector press the LEAVE button. Further information can be found at: http://www.ieee802.org/11/Email_Subscribe.html _______________________________________________________________________________ |