| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
| --- This message came from the IEEE 802.11 Task Group M Technical Reflector ---
Hello all, As discussed in the meeting, Naveen Kakani from Qualcomm request me to delay the consideration of the document for adoption. The reasons were:
1.
Low Cost APs (Host functionality is limited, primarily FW seems to be processing all the IEs), and carrier APs that JMC keeps referring to primarily that are not confirming to specs to begin with.
2.
capability indication would be useful is for roaming purposes, e.g. to know in advance whether an AP will support an individually requested Max BSS Idle Period He also requested me to create another version of the contribution with the capability bit related text.
To avoid confusion with multiple versions of the documents, I have added the text related with the capability bit in an Appendix. My hope was to have a straw poll on the capability bit and if the groups decision is to include it, then
have a motion to incorporate the text in the main as well as in the appendix. My own opinion is I could go either way as I am not philosophically against adding another bit. I do not believe it makes a great deal of difference in terms of implementation either. The updated document is
11-20-1313r8. Thanks. Regards, srini > -----Original Message----- > From: Srinivas Kandala > Sent: Monday, September 14, 2020 6:10 PM > To: 'STDS-802-11-TGM@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx' <STDS-802-11- > TGM@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: RE: 11-20/1313r2 on BSS Max Idle Period posted on server > > Per our discussion in today's meeting, I have uploaded r7 of the document > for tomorrow's considerations. Please let me know if you have any > comments. > Thanks. > Regards, > srini > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Srinivas Kandala > > Sent: Friday, September 11, 2020 9:18 AM > > To: 'STDS-802-11-TGM@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx' <STDS-802-11- > > Subject: RE: 11-20/1313r2 on BSS Max Idle Period posted on server > > > > Hello all, > > > > Following Mark H's comment I went and looked up D4.0: > > > > (#2085)The frame body consists of fields and elements as defined for > > each management frame subtype. All fields and elements are mandatory > > unless stated otherwise. Fields and elements appear in the specified, > > relative order, skipping fields or elements that are not > > present.(#1500)(#185) STAs that encounter an element ID they do not > > recognize in the frame body of a received Management frame ignore that > > element and continue to parse the remainder of the management frame > > body (if any) for additional elements with recognizable element IDs. > > > > It appears Mark is correct in his contention and we do not need a > > capability bit (I should have checked this part). If others feel the > > same, I can go ahead and remove the related changes and issue an > > updated version of the document. I have not received any comments on > > the other parts of the proposed text. But please let me know, so that, > > hopefully we can close it out by next week. > > > > Thanks. > > Regards, > > srini > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Srinivas Kandala > > > Sent: Thursday, September 10, 2020 10:53 AM > > > To: 'STDS-802-11-TGM@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx' <STDS-802-11- > > > TGM@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > Subject: RE: 11-20/1313r2 on BSS Max Idle Period posted on server > > > > > > Hello all, > > > > > > I have uploaded r4 of this document. It incorporates more edits. It > > > also add a new Capability bit at the AP to ensure that there are no > > > backward compatibility issues. > > > > > > Regards, > > > srini > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Srinivas Kandala > > > > Sent: Wednesday, September 9, 2020 10:12 AM > > > > To: 'STDS-802-11-TGM@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx' <STDS-802-11- > > > > TGM@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Subject: RE: 11-20/1313r2 on BSS Max Idle Period posted on server > > > > > > > > Hello all, > > > > > > > > Based on the additional comments I have received over the email, I > > > > further amended the document and r3 is on server now. > > > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > Best regards, > > > > srini > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > From: Srinivas Kandala > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, September 8, 2020 9:23 AM > > > > > To: STDS-802-11-TGM@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > > Subject: 11-20/1313r2 on BSS Max Idle Period posted on server > > > > > > > > > > Hi everyone, > > > > > > > > > > Per our discussion in the last week's Tgmd meeting, I have > > > > > posted > > > > > 11- 20/1313r2. I think I have incorporated all comments that I > > > > > have received in the meeting and offline. > > > > > > > > > > Please let me know if you have comments and I will try to > > > > > incorporate before the meeting. I plan to present either this or > > > > > a later version (if any) in the Wednesday meeting. > > > > > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > > Regards, > > > > > srini To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGM list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGM&A=1 |