| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
| --- This message came from the IEEE 802.11 Task Group M Technical Reflector ---
Thanks, Mark. I have uploaded r5. Please see inlined to your email as well. Regards, Youhan From: Mark Rison <m.rison@xxxxxxxxxxx> CAUTION: This email
originated from outside of the organization. Thanks, Youhan. Regarding the naming of "Standard power AP" (1) and "Indoor standard power AP" (4), while it may well be the case that a number of regulatory bodies use this term to mean "you need some kind of frequency coordination system", this is by no means global. For instance, my understanding is that currently at least CEPT has no such category, and so no device operating in corresponding countries would be a "Standard power AP" as currently described. Standard-power APs in CEPT countries would be low-power indoors/very low-power APs. [YK] CEPT defines Low Power Indoor (LPI) devices and Very Low Power (VLP) devices. So, LPI/VLP devices are LPI and VLP, respectively, not standard-power in CEPT. Note also that LPI and VLP are terms used by FCC. I.e., countries are adopting FCC terminology when discussing 6 GHz. For example, see the following countries using the same terminology “standard power”. https://www.ic.gc.ca/eic/site/smt-gst.nsf/eng/sf11643.html https://www.acma.gov.au/consultations/2021-04/rlan-use-5-ghz-and-6-ghz-bands-consultation-122021 I repeat my suggestion that a more neutral term be used. If there is a need to tie this with terminology used in certain regdoms then there could be informative text to that effect (e.g. "NOTE—An AP with external regulatory system [or whatever neutral term we come up with] is referred to as a Standard Power AP in FCC, ACMA and Costa Rican regulatory domains.", or an informative column in the table). I note though that your discussion section suggests "SP"s are in fact only allowed in the FCC regulatory domain. [YK] Thanks for your opinion, but I disagree with it. I view clearer alignment between widely used regulatory terms and the IEEE standard terminology to have higher benefit. I will wait for others
to chime in if they have opinions on this. As regards 1 v 3, my initial interpretation would be that "an enabling signal (as defined by the regulatory rules) from an indoor AP or an indoor standard power AP" is "control from an external system" and hence that "operation requires control from an external system" overlaps with "operation relies on being able to successfully receive an enabling signal (as defined by the regulatory rules) from an indoor AP or an indoor
standard power AP". In other words, as currently described an "Indoor enabled AP" is also a "Standard power AP". [YK] I have clarified that a WLAN STA is not an external system in r5. Thanks, Mark --
Mark RISON, Standards Architect, WLAN English/Esperanto/Français Samsung Cambridge Solution Centre Tel: +44 1223 434600 Innovation Park, Cambridge CB4 0DS Fax: +44 1223 434601 ROYAUME UNI WWW:
http://www.samsung.com/uk From: Youhan Kim <youhank@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Thank you, Mark. I have uploaded r4 incorporating most of your feedback. Attached version is r4 with some notable response to you included. Regards, Youhan From: Mark Rison <m.rison@xxxxxxxxxxx>
--- This message came from the IEEE 802.11 Task Group M Technical Reflector ---
CAUTION: This email
originated from outside of the organization. Thanks for this, Youhan. I think it is going in the right direction. I attach some comments. Thanks, Mark --
Mark RISON, Standards Architect, WLAN English/Esperanto/Français Samsung Cambridge Solution Centre Tel: +44 1223 434600 Innovation Park, Cambridge CB4 0DS Fax: +44 1223 434601 ROYAUME UNI WWW:
http://www.samsung.com/uk From: Youhan Kim <youhank@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
--- This message came from the IEEE 802.11 Task Group M Technical Reflector ---
Hi. Thank you very much all for the discussion on 11-21/790 regarding resolutions for 6 GHz related comments during the 5/13/2021 TGme meeting. I have uploaded r3 to the IEEE document server, addressing comments received during that meeting. Please let me know if you have any other feedback. Regards, Youhan To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGM list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGM&A=1
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGM list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGM&A=1
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGM list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGM&A=1 |