Re: [STDS-802-11-TGM] Proposed resolutions for CIDs on 802.1D withdrawal

Thread Links	Date Links
Thread Prev	Thread Next	Thread Index	Date Prev	Date Next	Date Index

Hi Mark,

Thanks for your comments. Did you look at the adhoc notes column in my document? I went through all of the comments and proposed resolutions based on the framework where we maintain the term User Priority for 802.11. I'm OK with dropping the 802.11 qualifier.

For CID 55, I have no issue with removing the 802.11 before UP, so I can update my resolution to:

Proposed Revised. Change

"The QoS facility supports eight priority values, referred to as UPs. The values a UP may take are the integer
values from 0 to 7 and are identical to the IEEE 802.1D™ priority tags."

"The QoS facility supports eight priority values, referred to as UPs. The values an IEEE 802.11 UP may take are the integer values from 0 to 7 and can be mapped to IEEE 802.1Q Priority Code Points."

See 802.1Q, clause 6.9.3 for the definition of Priority Code Points.

CIDs 58 and 59 are the same comment with alternative proposed resolutions. I'm proposing we accept the resolution to CID 59 which uses PCP.

CIDs 60 and 61 are the same comment with alternative proposed resolutions. I'm proposing we accept the resolution to CID 60 which uses PCP.

CIDs 66 and 67 are the same comment with alternative proposed resolutions. I'm proposing that we adopt a revised resolution based on the proposed resolution to CID 67.

CIDs 78 and 79 are the same comment with alternative proposed resolutions. I propose that we accept the resolution to CID 79, but if to get rid of the 802.11 qualifier on UP, the resolution would become:

Revised. Replace second sentence with, "Note that suggested default UPs differ from IEEE 802.1Q suggested default priorities. For example, in IEEE Std 802.11, priority 2 is lower than priority 0 while in IEEE Std 802.1Q it is higher."

Cheers,

Mike

On Wed, Jun 2, 2021 at 2:19 PM Mark Rison <m.rison@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I have a question regarding the term "802.11 UP", which appears in

55, 58, 61, 78, 79.

From what I'm understanding, the only thing that has a UP now is

802.11. 802.1D is dead and 802.1Q has PCPs not UPs. So I don't think

"UP" (or "user priority") needs to be adorned with "802.11".

In turn, I am confused by the "802.1Q UP"s (or "802.1Q default priorities")

in 59, 60, 66, 78. Aren't these all 802.1Q PCPs?

Thanks,

Mark

--

Mark RISON, Standards Architect, WLAN   English/Esperanto/Français

Samsung Cambridge Solution Centre       Tel: +44 1223 434600

Innovation Park, Cambridge CB4 0DS      Fax: +44 1223 434601

ROYAUME UNI                             WWW: http://www.samsung.com/uk

From: M Montemurro <montemurro.michael@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, 2 June 2021 18:55
To: STDS-802-11-TGM@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [STDS-802-11-TGM] Proposed resolutions for CIDs on 802.1D withdrawal

--- This message came from the IEEE 802.11 Task Group M Technical Reflector ---

Hi all,

I posted https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/21/11-21-0695-02-000m-revme-cc35-802-1d-comments.xlsx, which proposes resolutions to comments submitted with respect to updating REVme to address the withdrawal of 802.1D.

Based on the feedback after presenting this document twice and a careful review of the comments, I proposed resolutions to all the comments:

1) The group has discussed the comments in GREEN are marked them Ready for Motion on the REVme call on April 26.

2) I reviewed the comments in WHITE and believe they are simple resolutions that we can accept.

3) For the comments in YELLOW, I believe additional discussion is needed. I prepared resolutions under my proposed assumption that in the base 802.11 standard, we would want to maintain the default User Priority mapping that was originally defined in 802.1D. I renamed these 802.11 user priority values.

Before I schedule this document for presentation again, I'd like to solicit feedback on the reflector on these CIDs (namely the CIDs marked in YELLOW and WHITE).

Cheers,

Mike

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGM list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGM&A=1

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGM list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGM&A=1