Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
Hello,
This is what I have for this CID. Note that I'm wondering whether
DMG, CDMG and CMMG need to be added to the list, since they don't
have a FORMAT parameter.
Identifiers
Comment
Proposed change
CID 1948
Mark RISON
3.2
"non-HE PPDU" is not defined. Does it include S1G PPDUs, for example?
Add a definition based on the non-HT definition, but adding HT and VHT PHYs to the list
Discussion:
We have a definition of non-HT PPDUs:
non-high-throughput (non-HT) physical layer (PHY) protocol data unit (PPDU): A PPDU that is transmitted by a Clause 15 (DSSS PHY specification for the 2.4 GHz band designated for ISM applications), Clause 16 (High rate direct sequence spread spectrum (HR/DSSS) PHY specification), Clause 17 (Orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) PHY specification), or Clause 18 (Extended Rate PHY (ERP) specification) PHY, or not using a TXVECTOR FORMAT parameter equal to HT_MF, HT_GF or VHT.
However, we don’t have a definition of non-HE PPDUs.
Note that HT and VHT PHYs’ TXVECTOR includes a FORMAT parameter, so the clauses don’t need to be explicitly listed.
Proposed resolution:
REVISED
Add the following definition in Clause 3.2:
non-high-efficiency (non-HE) physical layer (PHY) protocol data unit (PPDU): A PPDU that is transmitted by a Clause 15 (DSSS PHY specification for the 2.4 GHz band designated for ISM applications), Clause 16 (High rate direct sequence spread spectrum (HR/DSSS) PHY specification), Clause 17 (Orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) PHY specification), or Clause 18 (Extended Rate PHY (ERP) specification) PHY, or not using a TXVECTOR FORMAT parameter equal to HT_MF, HT_GF, VHT or HE.
Thanks,
Mark
--
Mark RISON, Standards Architect, WLAN English/Esperanto/Français
Samsung Cambridge Solution Centre Tel: +44 1223 434600
Innovation Park, Cambridge CB4 0DS Fax: +44 1223 434601
ROYAUME UNI WWW: http://www.samsung.com/uk
From: Jon Rosdahl <jrosdahl@xxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, 9 March 2022 00:41
To: David Halasz <dave.halasz@xxxxxxxx>
Cc: David Goodall <dave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Mark Rison <m.rison@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Michael Montemurro <montemurro.michael@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: LB 258, GEN CID 1948
I have moved it to Mark RISON - Submission required.
Regards,
Jon
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jon Rosdahl Engineer, Senior Staff
IEEE 802 Executive Secretary Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
office: 801-492-4023 10871 North 5750 West
cell: 801-376-6435 Highland, UT 84003
A Job is only necessary to eat!
A Family is necessary to be happy!!
On Wed, Feb 23, 2022 at 12:17 PM David Halasz <dave.halasz@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
Correcting Jon's email address.
On Wed, Feb 23, 2022 at 2:15 PM David Halasz <dave.halasz@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi Jon,
CID 1948 is an HE comment rather than an S1G comment.
Can you take this one back or assign accordingly?
Also it might be easier to come up with a definition of "non-HE" rather than "non-HE PPDU".
Dave H.
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGM list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGM&A=1