--- This message came from the IEEE 802.11 Task Group M Technical Reflector ---
Hello Mike,
I am okay with the proposed change for the location 2074.61.
For 2074.64, I am okay with Joseph’s suggestion as well: change from “In a non-DMG non-CMMG non-S1G STA:” to: “In a STA that is neither a DMG STA, nor a CMMG STA, nor an S1G STA:”
Note that the text at 2074.64 is “In a non-DMG non-CMMG non-S1G STA:”.
Regards,
Emily
From: M Montemurro <montemurro.michael@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, March 11, 2022 8:08 AM
To: STDS-802-11-TGM@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-11-TGM] Regarding: Non-DMG non-CMMG non-S1G STA MAC architecture
--- This message came from the IEEE 802.11 Task Group M Technical Reflector ---
Hi Emily,
Thanks. So is there any objection to changing the resolution of CID 2258 from Rejected to Revised with the resolution:
change: “Non-DMG non-CMMG non-S1G STA MAC architecture” to “STA MAC architecture (Non-DMG non-CMMG non-S1G)” at 2074.61 and 2074.64
The CID for comment is 2258.
--- This message came from the IEEE 802.11 Task Group M Technical Reflector ---
Sorry,
I'm not sure what the CID is for this change, but are there any objections to making this change?
change: “Figure 10-1—Non-DMG non-CMMG non-S1G STA MAC architecture” to
“Figure 10-1—STA MAC architecture (Non-DMG non-CMMG non-S1G)”
Copying the reflector...
I'm not sure what the CID is for this change, but are there any objections to making this change?
I think the title you suggest is an improvement.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jon Rosdahl Engineer, Senior Staff
IEEE 802 Executive Secretary Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
office: 801-492-4023 10871 North 5750 West
cell: 801-376-6435 Highland, UT 84003
A Job is only necessary to eat!
A Family is necessary to be happy!!
Hi Emily and All,
I’ve been thinking about the CID discussed today trying to fix the title of Figure 10.1. I agree with the commentor that the phrasing is awkward and should probably be fixed.
However, I don’t agree with the commentor’s proposed change, as it changes the meaning.
Hence, how about changing: “Figure 10-1—Non-DMG non-CMMG non-S1G STA MAC architecture”
to “Figure 10-1—STA MAC architecture (Non-DMG non-CMMG non-S1G)”
Also the text following the figure should be modified for consistency. From
“In a non-DMG non-CMMG non-S1G STA:”
to: “In a STA that is neither a DMG STA, nor a CMMG STA, nor an S1G STA:”
I believe this construction makes some sense as the rest of section 10.2.1 define the architecture for these additional cases (DMG, SMMG, and S1G). Also, if it makes sense to
change the text as above, it may be preferred to use a similar construction for the figure title:
e.g.,
Figure 10-1—STA MAC architecture (for a STA that is neither a DMG STA, nor a CMMG STA, nor an S1G STA).
Is this helpful, or do you think rejection is preferred? I’ll accept either approach.
Regards,
Joseph
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGM list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGM&A=1
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGM list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGM&A=1
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGM list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGM&A=1
|