Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
--- This message came from the IEEE 802.11 Task Group M Technical Reflector ---
Hello, On 5/12/22, 3:11 PM, "Mark Rison" <m.rison@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: - 802.11 has a hatred of hyphens that transcends grammar, so it has to be "Vendor specific content", sadly - You also need to specify what the Trigger Dependent User Info subfield is for Vendor Specific Trigger frames I'm curious where this hatred comes from. And I'm also wondering what is the 802.11 rule that I'm missing that makes the capitalization be different between "Vendor specific content"
and "Vendor Specific Trigger frames". Dan. -- "the object of life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." – Marcus Aurelius Thanks, Mark --
Mark RISON, Standards Architect, WLAN English/Esperanto/Français Samsung Cambridge Solution Centre Tel: +44 1223 434600 Innovation Park, Cambridge CB4 0DS Fax: +44 1223 434601 ROYAUME UNI WWW:
http://www.samsung.com/uk From: Brian Hart (brianh) <00000c7561051aea-dmarc-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
--- This message came from the IEEE 802.11 Task Group M Technical Reflector ---
Hi all In 802.11me, it was suggested that wider discussion be solicited for the following CID. Feedback welcome. Best regards Brian
Discussion Trigger frames create a valuable new capability. Vendors might explore using Trigger frames in new ways such as prototyping ideas that might feed into a future amendment. In order
to enable such work, without the risk of it interfering with a future ANA assignment of the Trigger Type subfield, we recommend defining a Vendor Specific Trigger frame.
Due to the known pain of fragmenting/splitting elements, for future proofing, we further recommend the use of a 2-octet Length field. Proposed Resolution: CID 1056 Revised. Note to Commenter: The commenter’s concerns are valid and are substantially addressed in 22/0576R<motionedRevision> under CID 1056. Instruction to Editor: Implement the proposed text updates listed under CID 1056 in 22/0576R<motionedRevision> TGme Editor, make the following changes to D1.0 shown by Word track changes under CID 1056 Table 9-46—Trigger Type subfield encoding(11ax)
The Trigger Dependent Common Info subfield in the Common Info field is optionally present based on the value of the Trigger Type field (see 9.3.1.22.2 (Basic Trigger frame format)
to 9.3.1.22.10 (Vendor Specific Trigger frame format)) 9.3.1.22.10 Vendor Specific Trigger frame format The Trigger Dependent Common Info subfield of the Vendor Specific Trigger frame is defined in Figure 9-97a (Trigger Dependent Common Info subfield format in the Vendor Specific
Trigger frame).
Figure 9-97a (Trigger Dependent Common Info subfield format in the Vendor Specific Trigger frame) The Length field indicates the number of octets in the Trigger Dependent Common Info subfield excluding the Length field. The Organization Identifier field (see 9.4.1.31 (Organization Identifier field)) identifies the entity that has defined the content of the particular Vendor Specific element. See 9.4.1.31 (Organization Identifier field) for the definition of
j. To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGM list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGM&A=1
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGM list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGM&A=1 To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGM list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGM&A=1 |