Hello everyone,
During motions in REVme today, the resolution to approve the resolution to CID 2346 (see below) failed. The CID requests a definition for MC-OOK to be removed.
I think it would be good to get feedback from those who participated in 11ba so that any changes made are aligned with the text rolled in from P802.11ba-2021.
This CID has been assigned to Joseph Levy. Please provide feedback on this thread so that we can reach consensus on a resolution.
Thanks,
Mike
REVme CC36 Comments
2346 |
256.00 |
3.4 |
|
J |
MC-OOK is a strange
definition. Is MC-OOK symbol different
than regular OOK symbols, particularly the definition of MC-OOK OFF symbol
sounds rather strange. |
please clarify how MC-OOK is
different than regular OOK, and is the spec mandating this OOK symbol must be
generated by Multiple Carrier? If not, consider removing this definition. |
REJECTED (GEN: 2022-04-27
21:11:08Z) MC-OOK was added by 11ba and indicates the symbols used by
11ba. The definition is for a
multicarrier on-off keying (MC-OOK) symbol.
There is no use of just "OOK", only this definition and
usage. |
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGM list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGM&A=1