Abhi/all,
REVme looked at CID 1819 (copied below) today, as it does not appear to be getting covered in 11-22/0082 (yet) and it looked like it might be easy. However…
The claim, effectively, is that the technical points made in the bullets that are highlighted in the text below are already requirements for the Buffer Size field in the ADDBA Response that set up the block ack agreement. On suggestion, I looked at the requirements in subclause 26.4.3, but I don’t see any such requirement/restriction on the Buffer Size. In fact, I’m finding other places, for example P2273L63 (D1.0) that have phrases like, “…WinSizeB is set to the smaller of 1024 and the value of the MPDU Buffer Size field of the ADDBA Response frame that established the block ack agreement.” (or similar with 64).
So, at this point, I’m not convinced that these bullets are “not necessary”. Do you (or anyone on the reflector) have a reference for where there is a requirement that the Buffer Size in the ADDBA Response frame is already restricted to 64, 256 or 1024 (in the appropriate situations), as implied in the comment?
Thanks. Mark
CID | Clause | Page | Line | Comment | Proposed Change |
1819 | 10.25.2 | 2260 | 1 | "-- The transmission window is not greater than the value in the Buffer Size field of the ADDBA | Delete the last 2 bullets, and similarly delete the last 3 bullets in the next list (lines 15-22) |
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGM list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGM&A=1