Re: [STDS-802-11-TGM] Proposed REVme comment resolutions for various security related comments
--- This message came from the IEEE 802.11 Task Group M Technical Reflector ---
Would it not be better then, to include it as a single proposal in one TG?
Sent from my iPhone
> On May 17, 2023, at 11:29 AM, Jouni Malinen <jkmalinen@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 17, 2023 at 9:19 PM Sid Thakur <sid.th@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> The non-AP STA doesn’t always inform the AP when it is leaving the BSS and needs to keep the KCK for some amount of time. If the non-AP STA knows the duration for which the AP will keep the KCK, then it knows when to include the MIC and when not
>>
>> In general I think the idea is good, but IMHO we need to refine it a bit prior to a motion
>
> Please note that I'm planning on promoting that we would approve
> either the option 1 or option 1b in 537r3. In both of those cases, the
> AP will retain the PTK-KCK only for the duration of the association.
> In other words, this notification about potential extra time is not
> really relevant for those options. It would apply for option 2, but
> I'm planning on promoting the additional changes to be handled in
> P802.11bh/D1.0 LB instead of REVme now that TGbh is finally
> proceeding.
>
> - Jouni
_______________________________________________________________________________
IF YOU WISH to be Removed from this reflector, PLEASE DO NOT send your request to this
CLOSED reflector. We use this valuable tool to communicate on the issues at hand.
SELF SERVICE OPTION:
Point your Browser to - http://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGM and
then amend your subscription on the form provided. If you require removal from the reflector
press the LEAVE button.
Further information can be found at: http://www.ieee802.org/11/Email_Subscribe.html
_______________________________________________________________________________