Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

[STDS-802-11-TGM] REVme proposed resolutions on DMG/EDMG/CMMG text



--- This message came from the IEEE 802.11 Task Group M Technical Reflector ---

All,

 

On today’s REVme call, we made a couple proposals for comments related to DMG/EDMG/CMMG text, and would like to get confirmation/concern from any experts on those topics:

 

CID

Clause/Pg/Line

Comment

Proposed Change

Proposed Resolution

4244

10.25.5 (P1955.37)

"(11ay)In a DMG BSS, BlockAck and BlockAckReq frames transmitted between EDMG STAs as part of the

HT-immediate agreement shall be of EDMG Compressed BlockAck frame variant and Compressed

BlockAckReq variant or of EDMG Multi-TID BlockAck variant and Multi-TID BlockAckReq variant,

respectively." -- that "respectively" is not clear.

Change to "(11ay)In a DMG BSS, when transmitted between EDMG STAs as part of the HT-immediate agreement, BlockAck frames  shall be of EDMG Compressed BlockAck frame variant or of EDMG Multi-TID BlockAck variant, and BlockAckReq frames shall be of Compressed BlockAckReq variant or of Multi-TID BlockAckReq variant."

Accept.

4324

11.2.3.14 (P2401.47)

"The AP shall increase the value (modulo 256) of the Check Beacon field in the next transmitted TIM frame(s) when a critical up-date occurs to any of the elements inside the Beacon frame" -- doesn't this also apply to DMG beacons?  (S1G beacons are handled in 10.45.2)

Change "Beacon" to "Beacon or DMG Beacon"

REVISED: Change the cited text to "The AP shall increase the value (modulo 256) of the Check Beacon field in the next transmitted TIM frame(s) when a critical up-date occurs to any of the elements inside the Beacon or DMG Beacon frame" 

(Note to commenter, this clarifies which "Beacon" is being changed.)

 

Thanks.  Mark


To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGM list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGM&A=1