Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
--- This message came from the IEEE 802.11 Task Group M Technical Reflector ---
Hi, Joseph, Thank you for the proposed resolution. The test procedure outlined in Annex P applies the 80 nsec threshold on the RMS value of the relevant time measures. However, the proposed resolution simply states that the accuracy shall be … 80 nsec, which seems to be more stringent than the test procedure of Annex P. Hence, I would suggest that we do not rush into adopting the text changes from 11-24/943 at this point. Thanks. Youhan From: M Montemurro <montemurro.michael@xxxxxxxxx> WARNING:
This email originated from outside of Qualcomm. Please be wary of any links or attachments, and do not enable macros. --- This message came from the IEEE 802.11 Task Group M Technical Reflector ---
Hi Joseph, The plan for the PM2 meeting is to run motions on the remaining SA Ballot CIDs. After we get through those motions and if we have time, I will allocate time on the agenda to review your contribution. Otherwise, you can file a comment on
D6.0 during the next SA Ballot recirculation. Cheers, Mike On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 6:54 AM Joseph Levy <000019588066c6b7-dmarc-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGM list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGM&A=1 To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGM list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGM&A=1 |