Re: [STDS-802-11-TGM] Revision 1 of the proposed resolutions for 74 comments posted

[Jouni Malinen <jkmalinen@xxxxxxxxx>]

--- This message came from the IEEE 802.11 Task Group M Technical Reflector ---

CID 508: Strictly speaking, we do not have an MLME-DISASSOCIATE or MLME-DEAUTHENTICATE primitive. This "transition or receives or invokes an MLME Disassociation or Deauthentication primitive" should be changed to "transition, receives an MLME-DISASSOCIATE.indication or MLME-DEAUTHENTICATE.indication primitive, or invokes an MLME-DISASSOCIATE.request or MLME-DEAUTHENTICATE.request primitive". This type of construction is already used for the AP's SME just below this location (P3336 L49-50). In addition, the order of DISASSOCIATE and DEAUTHENTICATE for this non-AP STA case could be swapped here to be consistent with the AP case below.

- Jouni

On Mon, Sep 15, 2025 at 8:55 AM Edward Au <edward.ks.au@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

--- This message came from the IEEE 802.11 Task Group M Technical Reflector ---

Dear Mark,

Thank you very much for your comments.

I've addressed the majority of them.   Please refer to revision 1 of the material as follows:
https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/25/11-25-1612-01-000m-proposed-resolution-for-revmf-lb289-comments.xlsx

Of note is that while I do not address your remaining comment "More generally I suggest examining the ~35 instances of "to a value of" and deleting "a value of" where it's just waffle.  The ones that go "to a value of its choosing" are OK, the ones in TXVECTORs need to be "to the value of".  We can work offline to check the texts and see how these can be improved (as a separate contribution).

Regards,
Edward

---

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGM list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGM&A=1