---------- Forwarded message ----------
From:
Warren Kumari <warren@xxxxxxxxxx>Date: Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 11:03 AM
Subject: [OPSAWG] Start of 2nd WGLC for draft-ietf-opsawg-capwap-alt-tunnel
To: "
opsawg@xxxxxxxx" <
opsawg@xxxxxxxx>,
John.Kaippallimalil@xxxxxxxxxx, Liu Dapeng <
maxpassion@xxxxxxxxx>,
mgrayson@xxxxxxxxxDear OpsAWG WG,
This begins a WGLC for draft-ietf-opsawg-capwap-alt-tunnel - this WGLC
ends on June 29th.
This is the second WGLC for this document - it initially successfully
passed WGLC in August 2014
(
https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/opsawg/current/msg03522.html)
and was handed to the IESG for publication in early September 2014.
After it was sent to the IESG (in Feb 2015) a very similar draft
appeared - draft-you-opsawg-capwap-separation-for-mp. We realized that
two, very similar documents, with significant overlap would be
confusing, and so we requested that
draft-ietf-opsawg-capwap-alt-tunnel be returned to the WG and asked
the authors to merge them into one document. There was some delays,
but this has finally been completed.
The WG is requested to review the document and provide (clear)
feedback on if you believe it is ready for publication. If not, please
provide suggestions for improvement / text.
Please note: Even if you said it was great on the first WGLC, it is
very useful to repeat this comment now!
W
--
I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad
idea in the first place.
This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing
regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair
of pants.
---maf
_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list
OPSAWG@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg