| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
| --- This message came from the IEEE 802.11 Working Group Reflector ---
Hi Jon, Thanks for your reply. A couple of comments still: 1.
We agreed to a 30-day review on November 11. The draft came out on December 1st. If the ballot period had opened earlier (say the week after
the meeting), the issue would not have arisen. We signed a bit of a blank check by agreeing to a 30-day period without knowing when it would start. 30 days starting Nov 18 is not the same as 30 days starting Dec 1st.
2.
A 30-day review period usually implies four working weeks – give or take a few days. If the discrepancy is too high, I believe this should be taken
into account. If not now – then at least going forward. 3.
I know of at least one instance where the ballot period was changed by the WG chair (see attached email). In that case, it was a technical glitch that
would have prevented some people from having access to the full review period. Regardless, this precedent would indicate that the WG chair has the authority to extend the ballot period if conditions warrant it. I’m not making this request lightly. We should respect the relevant procedures. Nevertheless, I believe the current ballot period has some exceptional circumstances
to it. The question is how the interest of the TG is best served. I believe an extra week is beneficial to everyone, without interfering with the goal to finish the LB by the January meeting. Regards, Sigurd From: *** IEEE stds-802-11 List *** [mailto:STDS-802-11@xxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Jon Rosdahl --- This message came from the IEEE 802.11 Working Group Reflector ---
HI Graham and Sigurd, while I am sympathetic to your concerns, I would point out that the TG and WG voted and determined to have a 30 day LB. It would not be permissible to arbitrarily change the end date contrary to what the WG and TG voted for. (I would also note it was unanimous in November). FWIW, Jon
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 9:14 AM, gsmith <gsmith@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
_______________________________________________________________________________
If you wish to be removed from this reflector, do not send your request to this reflector - it will have no effect.
Instead, go to
http://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11 and then press the LEAVE button.
If there is no LEAVE button here, try
http://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-RO. Further information can be found at:
http://www.ieee802.org/11/Email_Subscribe.html _______________________________________________________________________________
This email, including its contents and any attachment(s), may contain confidential information of Quantenna Communications, Inc. and is solely for the intended recipient(s). If you may have received this in error, please contact the sender and permanently delete this email, its contents and any attachment(s). _______________________________________________________________________________ If you wish to be removed from this reflector, do not send your request to this reflector - it will have no effect. Instead, go to http://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11 and then press the LEAVE button. If there is no LEAVE button here, try http://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-RO. Further information can be found at: http://www.ieee802.org/11/Email_Subscribe.html _______________________________________________________________________________ |
--- Begin Message ---
- To: "STDS-802-11@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <STDS-802-11@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [STDS-802-11] FW: The dates of the Sponsor Ballot for P802.11 have been modified
- From: "Stephens, Adrian P" <Adrian.P.Stephens@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2016 14:35:38 +0000
--- This message came from the IEEE 802.11 Working Group Reflector --- Dear 802.11 members, If you are participating in the 802.11 (revision mc) ballot group, the current (second) recirculation sponsor ballot has been extended. The close date is 30th June. The reason is shown below. Best Regards, Adrian P STEPHENS Tel: +44 (1793) 404825 (office) Tel: +1 (971) 330 6025 (mobile) ---------------------------------------------- Intel Corporation (UK) Limited Registered No. 1134945 (England) Registered Office: Pipers Way, Swindon SN3 1RJ VAT No: 860 2173 47 -----Original Message----- From: IEEE-SA [mailto:sa-ballot@xxxxxxxx] Sent: 15 June 2016 15:31 Subject: The dates of the Sponsor Ballot for P802.11 have been modified To: undisclosed-recipients:; ... [Adrian P Stephens] Subject: The dates of the Sponsor Ballot for P802.11 have been modified This notification is to advise you that the dates of the sponsor ballot for P802.11 Standard for Information technology--Telecommunications and information exchange between systems Local and metropolitan area networks--Specific requirements Part 11: Wireless LAN Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY) Specifications have been modified as shown below: Ballot Close Date: 30-Jun-2016 Reason: Due to the random lack of email delivery of the 802.11 REVmc recirculation notification on Friday, 10 June related to an IEEE email incident, the Working Group chair has authorized this ballot extension. Thank you. _______________________________________________________________________________ If you wish to be removed from this reflector, do not send your request to this reflector - it will have no effect. Instead, go to http://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11 and then press the LEAVE button. If there is no LEAVE button here, try http://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-RO. Further information can be found at: http://www.ieee802.org/11/Email_Subscribe.html _______________________________________________________________________________
--- End Message ---