Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
--- This message came from the IEEE 802.11 Working Group Reflector ---
Dear 802.11 participants, Please be aware of the "Appeal of Ericsson, Graham Smith, and InterDigital vs IEEE-SA Standards Board (IEEE-SA appeal) - Concerning
the Action taken by the IEEE-SA Standards Board regarding the
802.11ax Dominance Complaint"
I presume that the
appeal will be heard by the IEEE-SA standards board. The next
regular meeting of the standards board is in March. The existence of this appeal does not affect processes in 802.11 in any way unless and until the standards board or 802 EC determine otherwise. Best Regards, Adrian Stephens IEEE 802.11 Working Group Chair mailto: adrian.p.stephens@xxxxxxxx Phone: +1 (971) 203-2032 Skype: adrian_stephens -------- Forwarded Message --------
Dear EC Members,
I received the attached appeal brief yesterday evening. It
is an appeal to the IEEE Standards Association Standards Board
concerning the findings of the 802.11ax dominance investigation
and the subsequent 802 EC action we took. JohnD, please post
this to the appeals section of the 802 website.
Now it is up to the Standards Board to handle the appeal, no
action is needed on our part that I am aware of. It will be
forwarded to the SASB Appeal Officers for review per IEEE SASB
Ops Man Section 5.8 Appeals (http://standards.ieee.org/develop/policies/opman/sect5.html#5.8).
I will keep you posted on any developments
Regards,
--Paul
------ Forwarded Message ------
From: "Dina Kallay" <dina.kallay@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "'Paul Nikolich'" <paul.nikolich@xxxxxxx>;
"Jana.Seidl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <Jana.Seidl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>;
"jean-philippe.faure@xxxxxxxxxxxx" <jean-philippe.faure@xxxxxxxxxxxx>;
"d.ringle@xxxxxxxx" <d.ringle@xxxxxxxx>
Cc: "p.nikolich@xxxxxxxx" <p.nikolich@xxxxxxxx>;
"e.m.lach@xxxxxxxx" <e.m.lach@xxxxxxxx>;
"gsmith@xxxxxxxxx" <gsmith@xxxxxxxxx>;
"Jim.Harlan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <Jim.Harlan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: 1/6/2017 10:12:16 AM
Subject: RE: Appeal Brief and Appendix - SASB Appeal - Resent
(non-confidential)
Dear Paul and
all, Jana’s IT
folks tell her it is impossible for her to take off the
automatic confidentiality signature. I am
therefore re-sending the appeal brief, in her stead,
without any confidentiality limitations. Thank you for
your consideration of this important matter, Dina From: Paul Nikolich
[mailto:paul.nikolich@xxxxxxx]
Dear Jana, I am unable to accept or
consider your notice. The confidentiality
notice at the bottom of your email is in violation of
the IEEE Standards Association's policy* (see IEEE
Operations Manual 4.1.1.5 Confidentiality Statements and
Copyright Notices on Communications https://standards.ieee.org/develop/policies/opman/sect4.html). Please resend the brief
without the confidentiality notice so that I may accept
it and distribute as appropriate. Regards, --Paul *4.1.1.5
Confidentiality Statements and Copyright Notices on
Communications ------ Original Message
------ Cc: p.nikolich@xxxxxxxx;
e.m.lach@xxxxxxxx; dina.kallay@xxxxxxxxxxxx;
gsmith@xxxxxxxxx;
Jim.Harlan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Sent: 1/5/2017 5:56:31 PM Subject: Appeal Brief and
Appendix - SASB Appeal
If you wish to be removed from this reflector, do not send your request to this reflector - it will have no effect. Instead, go to http://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11 and then press the LEAVE button. If there is no LEAVE button here, try http://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-RO. Further information can be found at: http://www.ieee802.org/11/Email_Subscribe.html _______________________________________________________________________________ |
Attachment:
Appeal Brief and Appendix - SASB Appeal (2017.01.05).pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document