Since Wednesday we have the following items that we wish to highlight to the WG:
Report out is given on slide #48.
Bob Grow reminded us that an explanation is needed when selecting yes to the RAC question item 6.1.b:
The PAR Review SC suggested that the text to add be as follows:
"The RAC may want to review for correct and consistent usage of registry terms”
Note also a Rebuttal to 802.15.4 Revision PAR was also prepared and sent to 802.15:
Rebuttal comment to 802.15.4 Revision:
802.11 comment:
5.2 adding “and other” seems to change the scope significantly. The change seems to allow any band.
Suggest to delete “and other” from the scope or alternatively identify what are the “other bands”.
802.15 Response:
Accept-in-principle; delete “operating in various license-exempt and other bands” resulting in “PHYs are defined for devices operating in a variety of geographic regions.”
802.11 Rebuttal:
The response does not address the concern of including “Any band”. We would like to not have the scope expand without definition or bounds. The phrase “devices operating in a variety of geographic regions” does not provide any information.
Regards,
Jon Rosdahl
802.11 PAR Review SC Chair
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jon Rosdahl Engineer, Senior Staff
office: 801-492-4023 Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
cell: 801-376-6435 10871 North 5750 West
Highland, UT 84003
A Job is only necessary to eat!
A Family is necessary to be happy!!
If you wish to be removed from this reflector, do not send your request to this reflector - it will have no effect.