| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
hello all,
i have just posted rev07 of the IEEE 802 comments to the FCC NPRM on revisiting the 5.9 GHz band,
the sections (NPRM points we are commenting on) have been shifted around some and several new ones added, which are from the documents sent out yesterday.
here are the sections that are new/updated:
4 Comments on the proposal on: “… designating 30 megahertz of spectrum will be sufficient to support ITS-related functions in the 5.9 GHz band—public safety applications involving safety of life and property—which will be part of a larger wireless ecosystem that advances national transportation and vehicular safety-related goals. [2] paragraph 10
5 Comments on “The Commission proposes to authorize C-V2X operations in the upper 20 megahertz of the 5.9 GHz band (5.905-5.925 GHz) as a means of authorizing the ITS technology that is most capable of ensuring the rapid development and deployment of continually improving transportation and vehicular safety-related applications now and into the future, that is robust, secure, and spectrally efficient, and that is able to integrate spectrum resources from other bands as part of its transportation and vehicular safety-related system. [2] paragraph 11
7 Comments on “… whether it should continue to set aside the 10 megahertz of spectrum at 5.895- 5.905 GHz for DSRC.” [2] paragraph 16
12 Comments on the statement: “… the DSRC service has evolved slowly and has not been widely deployed within the consumer automobile market …” [2] Paragraph 55
there are still some of the blue text with editor notes on where there are some possible questions yet, as we have had.
goal at the ad hoc this afternoon (3-5et, call in sent yesterday) is the same, though the section #ing has been updated
= the new/update sections (above)
= finishing up the blue text questions
= the conclusion
= all the references
= all of the non-blue (didn’t have ?s) sections/overall review
= then it is ready to make a clean copy to vote on tomorrow.
apologies in advanced, though if inputs come in the last couple of hours before the ad hoc, there is potential they might not be seen until the ad hoc.
getting there,
jay
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11 list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11&A=1