Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
--- This message came from the IEEE 802.11 Working Group Reflector ---
Hi All, TGm had discussed the proposed resolution for CID 3000 (DCN: 11-22/2208) during the January meeting but could not come to an agreement. This email is a follow-up to continue with the discussion and make progress towards a suitable resolution.
Brief summary of the discussion (during the Jan meeting): The first paragraph is meant to cover the case of reserved
(sub)fields while the second paragraph (being modified) is intended to cover the case of reserved
values. The proposal was to modify the second paragraph to clarify reserved values carried in non-reserved (sub)field. The group could not converge on a suitable text. Two alternatives were considered. -------- 9.2.2
Conventions[3000] TGm editor: Please
update the following paragraphs in this subclause as shown below:
Reserved fields and subfields defined in this clause are set to 0 upon transmission and are ignored upon reception.
NOTE 2—This applies to reserved fields and subfields in MAC headers. Reserved fields and subfields in PHY headers might be set to a nonzero value upon transmission, and might not
be ignored upon reception.
-------- Could you please review the proposed text and let me know if you have a preference or suggest an alternate?
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11 list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11&A=1 |