IEEE P802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)

The IEEE P802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) develops Personal Area Network standards for short distance wireless networks. The following page contains the official results of the WG Letter Ballot 1 as tallied by our Technical Editor Tom Siep..

IEEE P802.15.1 LETTER BALLOT 1 RESULTS

Letter Ballot 1 MOTION: To submit the contents of document IEEE P802-15/D0.6 to Sponsor Ballot [default recirculation ballot].

Letter Ballot 1 RESULT: Motion failed with 18/15/2 or 43% (P802-15/D0.6)

Note 1: This motion was Technical by definition and therefore required a 75% or greater approval to pass.
Note 2: Letter Ballot #1 Results (Detail) in HTML.

IEEE P802.15.1 LETTER BALLOT 1 DETAIL VOTE

IEEE P802.15.1 LETTER BALLOT 1 NET VOTE

Note: Two (2) of our No Voters (Daniel R. McGlynn & Ivan Reede) need to submit comments and until they do the above results are valid LB1 results i.e., they are classified as a "no response" or counted in the failed to vote category until comments are provided. In other words there were 17 Nea's but 2 lacked comments to bring their No vote to a Yes. Therefore they are counted as Failed to Vote.

IEEE P802.15.1 LETTER BALLOT 1 COMMENT RESOLUTION PROCESS

We have provided four (4) MS Word files for your review; please find the following files on the LB1 comments in the Letter Ballot 1 Details in a Zip (151KB) archive.

1. 99172r0aP802-15-TG1-LB1-Comments.doc contains only technical and Technical comments, sorted by Clause
2. 99172r0bP802-15-TG1-LB1-Comments.doc contains only editorial and Editorial comments, sorted by Clause
3. 99172r0cP802-15-TG1-LB1-Comments.doc contains all comments on D0.6, sorted by voter
4. 99172r0dP802-15-TG1-LB1-Comments.doc documents those persons in the WG that did not register comments against D0.6

If you have problems or questions about comments contained in the aforementioned documents, I encourage interaction between the interested parties. If you have a contrary opinion please post it to the reflector, send it to me (siep@ti.com), or (at the very least) bring it to Tel Aviv.

Official resolution of these comments will take place at our next meeting in Tel Aviv. However, the more we can get done beforehand, the more likely we will be able to address all the technical issues.

Each of the technical comments in document 99172r0aP802-15-TG1-LB1-Comments.doc must be answered (resolved) in one of the following ways:

• The requested change is made to the Draft
• Another change is made to the Draft and the author of the comment is satisfied that it solves the problem
• Interaction with the author of the comment results in the author dropping the objection
• Requested change is not made and the author is issued a written explaination as to why the change will not be made

We must resolve the technical comments as a body. We will also try to address as many of the editorial comments as possible to ensure speedy transition to Draft 1.0.

Finally, we have provided a working document to be used by the membership to capture their Letter Ballot 1 Reply Comments; in an MS Excel (344KB) archive.

See you in Tel Aviv,
--
Tom Siep
Wireless Communications Business Unit
Texas Instruments
(214) 480-6786
(972) 761-5581 FAX
siep@ti.com

If you would like to contact the IEEE 802.15 Webmaster, email to giffordi@ieee.org © Copyright 2000, IEEE.   Terms & Conditions.  Privacy & Security

(giffordi@ieee.org)
URL: http://ieee802.org/15/pub/LB1/LB1-Results.html
(Modified: 27-Jul-2000 ), Rev. 0.1