Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

RE: stds-802-16-mobile: Handoff document

Dear Avi and all,
 
I agree with Avi.
 
I thought that "soft" and "hard" terms should be provided with relevant context in order to prevent
misinterpretation of the terms.
The items 2.2.1 and 2.2.2 were a way to insert the "soft" and "hard" HO as given by Vladimir Yanover in C80216e-03/01
without stating the explicitly "soft" and "hard" terms.
 
There was no explicit decision to exclude soft handoff, and I think that considering soft handoff is relevant and should be made,
by providing with it the relevant context.
 
Itzik Kitroser
 
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-stds-802-16-mobile@majordomo.ieee.org [mailto:owner-stds-802-16-mobile@majordomo.ieee.org]On Behalf Of Avi Freedman
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 9:50 AM
To: stds-802-16-mobile@ieee.org
Subject: stds-802-16-mobile: Handoff document

Dear Handoff ad-hoccers
 
I have been looking at the document Itzik had complied.  I haven't seen any mentioning of the possibility of soft handoff.  Was there any decision to exclude it?  Soft handoff is not necessarily CDMA, you know, and it might provide an advantage.
 
Avi Freedman