Dear Itzik and Phillip
Thanks for your reply...
I think that the listening interval would affect the
data receiving time. if the lietening interval is short, it may be
happened that the BS shall buffer the data and the data transmission will be
delayed...Becuase the short listening interval may deminish the
receiving(at MSS) and transmitting(at BS) attempt.Therefore, if the battery of the MSS is enough (e.g the MSS
with fixed power in car, train, or something like that...), the MSS would be
waiting with relatively longer listening interval. Therefore in your mail the
mentioning the MSS wants short listening interal any time may not be
correct..As results, it should be allowed
that the MSS suggest the listening interval based on its power
status.... from my understanding
From BS scheduling point of view..
To adjust the exact and effect scheduling point at
the BS side, the listening interval should be allocated dynamically to be
reflected the traffic pattern..
Even in allocating the fixed listening interval, the
real listening interval will be decided based on the traffic pattern (take
sleep interval increasing...) And also, because sleep-interval as well as
listening interval will be dependent of the traffic pattern and decided when
the MSS goes to sleep mode, not exchanging REG-REQ/RSP message(like as current
docuement)..Therefore, the allocation of listening interval during REG-REQ/RSP
exchanging may not be correct and reflect the traffic
status...
So my understanding is ...
The MSS suggests the listening interval(based on its
power status) and the BS allocate it (based on scheduling
policy)..during MOB_SLP-REQ/RSP exchanging same as the original
approach
Thanks
Changhoi
Koo