stds-802-16-mobile: Re: Security Issues Discussion
Yoon hi,
Thanks for your msg and list of ETRI contacts. I think we all agree
regarding most of your procedural
suggestions. Note however that "internetworking between different
networks" is not part of our scope
or mandate. Also Brian initially suggested presenting initial work in
January, then the final contribution
at the next plenary - but obviously sooner is better.
>- We will list up the other issues to discuss in this Ad Hoc group
such as coexistence of original privacy mechanisms and open privacy
mechanisms, security issues during handover, >and enhancement of privacy
mechanisms, etc
Agreed.
Regards,
- Jeff
csyoon@etri.re.kr wrote:
> Dear Jose, DJ, and Jeff,
>
> Hi! I'm Chulsik Yoon.
> It was very good start we discussed and shared with the various
> persons of the idea of adding open security architecture above the
> current PKM architecture of 802.16.
>
> As I told you before, I reported the result of the meeting and my
> thought of promoting the work fruitfully. We discussed and concluded
> our basic stance to work that issue.
>
> We assigned and encouraged the following engineers to work with the Ad
> Hoc group members:
> Park, Ae Soon : aspark@etri.re.kr (Principal research engineer)
> Yun, Mi Young : myyun@etri.re.kr (Research engineer)
> Cho, Seok Heon : chosh@etri.re.kr (Research engineer), and me
> (csyoon@etri.re.kr)
>
> I will work as the contact point of ETRI members. And other research
> engineers will participate in the discussion case by case:
>
> Lee, Sang Ho (leesh@etri.re.kr)
> Moon, Jung Mo (jmmoon@etri.re.kr)
> Chang, Sung Cheol (scchang@etri.re.kr)
>
> Our basic thought to work is as follows:
> - We will cooperate with Intel (Jose and DJ), StreetWaves (Jeff), and
> other members who interested in the open privacy architecture and
> interworking between different networks.
>
> - The main players will discuss and construct the framework agreed
> between them, and afterwards we will release to other working group
> members for review and comment.
>
> - We hope that our contributions (C802.16e-03/62 & C802.16e-03/63)
> will be treated as the base document to work to constructing the
> framework.
>
> - The resulting document will be described as a contribution document
> to submit the next meeting (Session #29, Vancouver) by the name of
> main contributors.
>
> - We will list up the other issues to discuss in this Ad Hoc group
> such as coexistence of original privacy mechanisms and open privacy
> mechanisms, security issues during handover, and enhancement of
> privacy mechanisms, etc. So we will promote this Ad Hoc group works as
> the seed for the enhancement of 802.16 specification in security and
> higher layer capabilities.
>
> - We will utilize the e-mail discussions between Ad Hoc group members
> as the main tools for discussion.
>
>
> I'm looking forward to your reply (your opinions).
>
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Chulsik Yoon
>
> p.s. You can call me C.S. or YOON.
>