Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
Hello
Jung, I
think that the point you have raised may be the main difference between the
documents. With
all the respect, I don’t agree with the opinion that the one message
exchange at a time is the desired way to go. I
think that both of the contributions identified that under certain scenarios,
some of the message exchanges may be optional due to the availability of the
information at the Target BS. In our contribution, we have tried to optimize
the network entry by concatenating the required messages under one handshake
process, e.g. one transmission from the MSS. In
your contribution, you propose to have multiple transmissions (e.g. several
frames for the network re-entry) but with unsolicited grants from the BS to
make the process more efficient. I
think that both of the approaches may be easily combined, with a control from
the BS (on the size of the unsolicited allocation) according to the link conditions
and failure probability. Regards, Itzik. -----Original Message----- Dear Itzik and all: How are you? Since you are not
going to come to the ad hoc meeting in this weekend, we’ve got to harmonize
before this weekend. First of all, I’d like to know your
understandings and position on my contribution. Actually, 04/87r1 had
been written before 04/105 document was written. Hence, although there are lots
of rooms to optimize the HO re-entry process, the procedure that you proposed
seems not to accomplish what we have been desiring so far – one message pair
exchange for HO re-entry. Let me know your
thoughts. Best regards, Jung-Won Kim --------------------------------------------------------- Jung-Won
Kim, Ph.D. Senior
Engineer NTP
SystemLab. 1 Telecommunication
Systems Division Telecommunication
Network Samsung
Electronics Co., Ltd. Office: +82-31-279-3356 Mobile: +82-10-9530-3356 Email: jungwon74.kim@samsung.com --------------------------------------------------------- |