[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: stds-802-16-tg1: Re: [wirelessman_tg1] Comment resolution
Title: RE: stds-802-16-tg1: Re: [wirelessman_tg1] Comment
res
Demos,
Your message below was bounced by the reflector because of the
attachment. I have inserted the content of the attachment below.
When you suggested that you were "late in the comment
cycle", I suspected that your comments applied to an out-of-date
draft. However, I checked, and they actually apply to the current
draft (IEEE 802.16.1/D1-2000). Therefore, you comments are not late;
the deadline is January 16.
On the other hands, your comments did not arrive in the
requested format. We would much appreciate it if you could resubmit
these comments using the Comment Form
<http://ieee802.org/16/tg1/docs/802161-01_01.doc>. This will make it possible to get your comments
into our comment database, from which we can easily consider, respond
to, and track the suggestions.
Thanks for your input.
Regards,
Roger
Attached find some last minute comments
for TG1 for your group's
consideration.
As lately I have not closely followed the TG1 efforts, these comments
are
probably late in the comment cycle. I am sorry for that and I
leave it up
to you to make the best use of these comments as TG1 sees fit.
These comments can be attributed to,
Antonis Karvelas
Broadband Wireless Research Engineer
mailto : akarb@intranet.gr
and my self
Dr. Demosthenes J. Kostas
Director, Industry Standards
Adaptive Broadband Corporation
3314 Dartmouth Ave
Dallas, TX 75205 USA
tel: 214 520 8411
fax: 214 520 9802
=========================================================================
Attached find some last minute comments for TG1 for your
group's
consideration.
As lately I have not closely followed the TG1 efforts, these comments
are
probably late in the comment cycle. I am sorry for that and I
leave it up
to you to make the best use of these comments as TG1 sees fit.
These comments can be attributed to,
Antonis Karvelas
Broadband Wireless Research Engineer
mailto : akarb@intranet.gr
and my self
Dr. Demosthenes J. Kostas
Director, Industry Standards
Adaptive Broadband Corporation
3314 Dartmouth Ave
Dallas, TX 75205 USA
tel: 214 520 8411
fax: 214 520 9802
Comments on Draft Standard for Air Interface
for Fixed Broadband Wireless Access Systems
1. Page 19, Line 35: You must add the downstream in
the definition of the burst profile. Add the word downstream in the
sentence "Set of parameters that describe the upstream
transmissionŠ" .
2. Page
43, Line 15-17: There is nowhere definition of the DCC-REQ and
DCC-RSP MAC Management messages.
3. Page 59, Line 8: This setting doesn't exist in the Configuration
File based on the 9.2.2 section. I believe that you must delete this
and also the 11.4.4 section.
4. Page 110, Line 61: There is an inconsistency between sections
6.2.3.2 and 6.2.3.4.
In section 6.2.3.2 the standard notes that "The SS achieves
MAC synchronization once it has received at least one DL-MAP message.
A SS MAC remains in synchronization as long as it continues to
successfully receive the DL-MAP and DCD messages for its
Channel".
In section 6.2.3.4 the standard notes that "The SS MAC
remains in synchronization as long as it continues to successfully
receive the DL-MAP, UL-MAP, DCD and UCD messages."
I believe that may be two types of synchronization.
(a) Upstream synchronization: The SS must receive periodically UCD
and UL-MAP messages to retain synchronization, otherwise search for
other upstream channel. The loss of this synchronization doesn't mean
that the SS lose downstream synchronization.
(b) Downstream synchronization: The SS must receive periodically DCD
and DL-MAP messages to retain synchronization, otherwise search for
other downstream channel and of course lose not only downstream but
also upstream synchronization.
5. Page 111, Line 8: I believe that the Figure 60 must include the
DCD messages from the BS.
6. Page 114, Line 47: What is the meaning of the DSC-Remote and
DSC-ACK here ? I believe that the text in the box must be replaced
with "Increase local power" as in a previous version of the
standard.
7. Page 117, Line 6: I believe that the standard must clarify which
MAC management messages will be used for the implementation of the
DHCP mechanisms.
8. Page 217, Line 52: The standard must clarify with details where in
the downstream frame the SS is responsible to hear. It notes that:
"Each SS continuously receives the entire downstream burst,
decodes the data in the DS burst, and looks for MAC headers
indicating data for that SS.", but the "burst" is
a downstream region with specific PHY characteristics. I believe that
a SS is responsible to hear the Frame Control Header and the DIUC for
which is assigned to, and not to the other DIUC regions.
9. Page 219, Line 36: I believe that the sentence: "Then, p=
kn + j where j is the number of integral FEC blocks that fit in the
burst and is the number of PS remaining after integral FEC blocks are
allocated." must be replaced with the following:
"Then, p= kn + j where k is the number of integral FEC blocks
that fit in the burst and j is the number of PS remaining after
integral FEC blocks are allocated."
10. Page 219, Line 46: I believe that the "symbols"
must be replaced with "PSs".
11. Page 219, Line 54: I believe that the "symbols"
must be replaced with "PSs".
12. Page 219: I believe that in the region 8.2.1.2.7 the standard
must remarks that the supporting of the Shortened FEC Block for the
downlink bursts is optional as referred to the section 11.1.2.2 .
13. Page 222, Line 28: I believe that in the title of region
8.2.1.5.2 the "Upstream" must be replaced with
"Downstream".
14. Page 235, Line 16: I believe that the only case to use the
stuff_byte pattern is when the MAC sends the last codeword and the
Last Codeword Length for this burst is fixed. Is there any case to
have gaps between MAC PDUs of the same burst? Based on the Downstream
Frame format there is the need to implement a buffer mechanism with
12 banks where each memory bank corresponds to one DIUC region and
stores MAC PDUs for that DIUC region. There is not a reason to have
gaps between the MAC PDUs of the same memory bank.
15. Page 236, Line 42: The standard must clarify when the scrambler
is cleared. At the beginning of each Downstream Frame or at the
beginning of each TDM burst (that is at the beginning of each
modulation/FEC different region - DIUC)?
16. Page 236, Line 48: I believe that the sentence: "The
sequence generator pauses while parity bites are being
transmitted." must be replaced with: "The sequence
generator pauses while parity bytes are being transmitted from the
Reed Solomon Encoder." in order to demystify the text and to
show that when the Reed Solomon transmits the check bytes the
scrambler must be in a hold (not running) state.
17. Page 237, Line 48: There is an inconsistency with Table 49 where
the Error correction capability is defined as R=0-32 (T=0-16).
18. Page 238, Line 1: I believe that the standard must clarify the
reasons for the codeword size (K+R) to be an even number.
19. Page 238, Line 1: There is an inconsistency with Table 60 where
the Error correction capability is defined as R=0-32 (T=0-16).
20. Page 279, Line 51: The text must show that the "Network
Access Configuration Setting" is the same with the Network
Access Control Object of the 11.4.3 Encoding.
21. Page 312: Where are these parameters come from? If the SS
Capabilities Encoding stored in the SS (in a non-volatile storage)
during the manufacturing phase, the standard must declare this.
22. Page 317, Line 1: I can't find this configuration setting in the
REG-RSP message in the region 6.2.1.2.8 .