RE: stds-802-16-tg4: new 802.16b Strawman
I feel using the unqualified phrase "Recommended practice" in Section 8 is
misleading as it implies that Synchronization is always beneficial. For
some applications use of proposed synchronuzation(albeit optional) will
unnecessarily constrain system design and for example undermine the higher
efficiencies that can result from independent dynamic asymmetric UL/DL
traffic allocation of the different systems. I thus proposed that the phrase
Recommended practice should be removed and some words on the system
complexities and constrains that result when using Synchronization should be
added.
I thank you
demos
Dr. Demosthenes J. Kostas
Director, Industry Standards
Adaptive Broadband Corporation
3314 Dartmouth Ave
Dallas, TX 75205 USA
tel: 214 520 8411
fax: 214 520 9802
-----Original Message-----
From: Octavian Sarca [mailto:osarca@redlinecommunications.com]
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2001 4:27 PM
To: Stds-802-16-Tg4 (E-mail)
Subject: stds-802-16-tg4: new 802.16b Strawman
Dear All,
The new 802.16b Strawman can be found at:
http://www.redlinecommunications.com/802.16b.strawman.doc
Since we are running out of time, I publish it even if I am still
missing updates on some sections and waiting for some feedback on
sections 4 and 5.
The document includes contributions from Nico, Yossi, Sean, and Brian. I
have also used what Demos sent through TG4 reflector. Thank you all.
From now on I will incorporate comments/updates from section leaders
immediately and I will use the reflector to announce when a new version
is available. The same applies for the very disputed section 4 where we
have 4 different authors for 4 subsections.
Best Regards,
Octavian Sarca
Redline Communications Inc.
90 Tiverton Crt. #102
Markham, ON, L3R 9V2
E-mail: osarca@redlinecommunications.com