RE: REGS/ RE: stds-802-16-tg4: Re: 5GHz Fixed Wireless Access indanger!
Colleagues,
Please focus on the subject of the e-mail you are referring to: The subject
is the NPRM to improve the sharing possibilities in part 15.247 on one hand
and to permit higher data rates in the same rules.
Note that the group did not get a chance to study the remark in the FNPRM
regarding the rules in the U-NII band.
The document gives a report of what the group came-up with.
If you want to contribute to that group's thought process, please provide
input to the regs reflector as soon as possible, so we can look at the
merits of your proposals.
Thanks
---------------
Vic Hayes
Agere Systems Nederland B.V., formerly Lucent Technologies
Zadelstede 1-10
3431 JZ Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
Phone: +31 30 609 7528 (Time Zone UTC + 2)
FAX: +31 30 609 7498
e-mail: vichayes@agere.com
http://www.orinocowireless.com/
> ----------
> From: Marianna Goldhammer[SMTP:mariannag@breezecom.co.il]
> Sent: 12 June 2001 19:00 PM
> To: David Chauncey
> Cc: j.carlo@ieee.org; Roger B. Marks; stds-802-16-tg4@ieee.org;
> reflector 802.regs
> Subject: REGS/ RE: stds-802-16-tg4: Re: 5GHz Fixed Wireless Access
> in danger!
>
>
> David,
>
> I think that before working on NPRM,
> we should have an agreed 802 strategy regarding the 5GHz band splitting
> between different working groups. I see the UNII FCC regulations as a good
> base for doing that, based on the limitations of the transmitted power.
>
> The 802.16 interests are related to high level transmitted power, the
> 802.11
> and 802.15 want to limit it at lower level.
>
> It is clear that in the near future FCC will unify ISM and UNII
> regulations
> in 5GHz, so we should already consider this consolidation and have an
> agreement based on BW splitting. This will not preclude the lower power
> systems to work in the higher bands, for example indoor . Nevertheless,
> the focus of the higher bands should be the Fixed Wireless Access.
> I would like to see in that band more waivers for P-MP, sectorized
> antenna systems.
>
> Lets discuss this in the next teleconference. I will be happy to join.
> Please send me the bridge number.
>
> Marianna
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Chauncey [mailto:Dchauncey@Clearwire.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2001 2:52 PM
> To: Marianna Goldhammer; Roger B. Marks; stds-802-16-tg4@ieee.org
> Cc: Hayes, Vic
> Subject: RE: stds-802-16-tg4: Re: 5GHz Fixed Wireless Access in danger!
>
>
> Marianna,
> There will be another conference call to discuss this NPRM on June 22,
> 2001,
> 7-9 AM PDT. We can discuss the issues with Vic at that time.
> Regards,
> David
>
>
> David C. Chauncey
> Clearwire Technologies Inc.
> PO Box 850
> Cheektowaga, NY 14225-0850
> Voice: (716) 631-6409
> Fax: (716) 631-6080
> dchauncey@clearwire.com
> http://www.clearwire.com
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-stds-802-16-tg4@majordomo.ieee.org
> [mailto:owner-stds-802-16-tg4@majordomo.ieee.org] On Behalf Of Marianna
> Goldhammer
> Sent: Monday, June 11, 2001 5:53 PM
> To: Roger B. Marks; stds-802-16-tg4@ieee.org
> Cc: Hayes, Vic
> Subject: RE: stds-802-16-tg4: Re: 5GHz Fixed Wireless Access in
> danger!
>
> Dear Roger,
>
> For clarification, the FCC notice 01-158, makes no distinction
> between indoor/outdoor installations. OFDM falls in the class of
> "digital modulation system".
>
> All the systems in 5GHz ISM band are "1Watt", for more than 700KHz BW
> direct sequence, in case of the old rules.
>
>
> My interpretation of the text in the teleconf is:
>
> - digital modulation systems are limited to a power density
> under 10dBm/MHz and a transmitted power under 100mW;
>
> - outdoor and P-P systems are allowed to transmit 1W, according
> to the old rules, meaning no more than 8dBm/3kHz, while keeping
> the processing gain rule - being DIRECT SEQUENCE
> (not OFDM!) systems.
>
> I will be the first to be happy if my interpretation was wrong.
>
>
> Marianna