stds-802-16: +++Recirculation Ballot #2a: TG2 Coexistence Draft (update)
I have updated the Balloting Tool to Revision 1:
<http://ieee802.org/16/docs/01/80216-01_02.doc>.
There are two changes:
(1) I added an instruction item that reads: 'You are encouraged to
comment on portions of the draft which are not the subject of comment
resolution and therefore not the subject of this ballot. However, you
may not designate such comments as "binding" and may not use them as
a basis of a "Disapprove" vote.'
(2) In the first of the ten comment pages, I fixed a faulty popup box
that gave the options "Editorial" and "Technical" but did not
distinguish between "Technical, Binding" and "Technical, Non-binding".
Please use the new version. The old version will work fine as long as
you understand the instructions and don't put a technical comment in
Comment Page 1.
Roger
>This announcement opens IEEE 802.16's Recirculation Ballot #2a.
>Participation is optional, but Members and Observers are encouraged
>to participate.
>
>Motion: To approve the proposed resolutions (as represented in
>Document IEEE 802.16-01/01) of comments received in 802.16 Letter
>Ballot #2, and to forward, for Sponsor Ballot, a Draft Standard to
>be created by applying these resolutions to IEEE 802.16/D1-2000.
>
>Ballot opening date: 10 January 2001
>Ballot closing date: 20 January 2001 (local time anywhere on Earth)
>
>Document under review: IEEE 802.16-01/01
> <http://ieee802.org/16/docs/01/80216-01_01.pdf>
>Document title:
> "Comment Resolutions for Approval in IEEE 802.16 Recirculation Ballot #2a"
>
>Balloting tool: <http://ieee802.org/16/docs/01/80216-01_02.doc>.
> To participate in the ballot, you must download this file and use
>it to prepare your vote and comments. Submission instructions are
>included.
>
>Important Notes:
>
>(1) The comment resolutions included here were developed by a TG2
>team led by TG2 Chair Phil Whitehead. Roger Marks and new TG2 Editor
>Muya Wachira edited the comment resolutions for clarity and
>consistency.
>
>(2) Participation in this recirculation ballot is NOT required by
>IEEE 802.16 and will NOT affect your membership status.
>
>(3) If you have no comment to make on the proposed resolutions and
>if their approval would not alter your vote in 802.16 Letter Ballot
>#2, then you need not cast a ballot. In this case, your previous
>vote will stand.
>
>(4) If you wish to comment on the proposed resolutions or if their
>approval would alter your vote in Letter Ballot #2, then please cast
>a ballot. If you voted "Disapprove" on Letter Ballot #2, then your
>vote is critical to the progress of the Draft and we strongly
>encourage you to submit a ballot.
>
>Regards,
>
>Roger
>
>Dr. Roger B. Marks <mailto:marks@nist.gov>
>Chair, IEEE 802.16 WG on Broadband Wireless Access <http://wirelessman.org>
>National Wireless Electronic Systems Testbed (N-WEST) <http://nwest.nist.gov>
>National Institute of Standards and Technology/Boulder, CO
><http://www.nist.gov>
>tel: +1 303 497 3037 fax: +1 303 497 7828