Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

stds-802-16: RE: submitting 802.16a comments



Roger,

Thanks for the clarification.
I presume, this includes also that the WG will run comments resolution  
business at the nearest meeting? At least for MAC, where mergers etc.
were not requested.

Vladimir


-----Original Message-----
From: Roger B. Marks [mailto:r.b.marks@ieee.org]
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 4:13 PM
To: Vladimir Yanover
Cc: stds-802-16@ieee.org
Subject: submitting 802.16a comments


Vladimir:

The Call for Contributions 
<http://ieee802.org/16/docs/02/80216-02_22.pdf> includes the 
paragraph "Detailed change proposals may also be itemized in 
Commentary format." This gives you the opportunity to submit your 
comments.

Roger


>Roger,
>
>	I ask for clarification of the procedure when we proceed with
>802.16a.
>At some moment I have decided to take back formally my disagreement
>with certain 802.16a topics and vote "Approve". There was an assumption
>(that we all shared) on successful proceeding to Sponsor Ballot where
>the same comments might be re-submitted. 
>
>	Unfortunately, we find ourselves in position when the document
>does not go immediately to Sponsor Ballot. In this case I would like
>to re-submit certain unresolved comments (mainly MAC stuff). The problem is
>that we have no ongoing process of comments resolution and no
>active call for comments.  I believe there are more people in this
position.
>What is the right procedure?
>
>Thanks
>
>Vladimir