RE: stds-802-16: letter from ITU-R to IEEE 802.16
That makes sense.
-----Original Message-----
From: Roger B. Marks [mailto:r.b.marks@ieee.org]
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 10:37 AM
To: Kiernan, Brian G.
Cc: stds-802-16@ieee.org
Subject: RE: stds-802-16: letter from ITU-R to IEEE 802.16
Brian,
Our letter to ITU-R focused on our existing (fixed) standards.
Note that the ITU-R response discusses an issue closely related to the
one you mentioned:
"The meeting discussed in which ITU-R series this draft Recommendation
should be developed. The ITU-R view is that the initial preparation
should be based on a F-series Recommendation (Fixed service) taking into
account that the material derived from the IEEE Standard 802.16 would
focus on fixed aspects of the standard. Subsequently, the inclusion of
the mobility capabilities would be the aim of a M-series Recommendation
(Mobile service)."
Roger
At 10:06 -0500 03/12/12, Kiernan, Brian G. wrote:
>Given that 8A-9B gets disbanded, an interesting question arises as to
>which Study Group to work with. SG 9 is very specifically fixed
service
>only, while SG 8 is very specifically mobile. 802.16e cuts across
both,
>so we may have to work with both.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Roger B. Marks [mailto:r.b.marks@ieee.org]
>Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 10:23 PM
>To: stds-802-16@ieee.org
>Subject: stds-802-16: letter from ITU-R to IEEE 802.16
>
>We have received an interesting letter from ITU-R entitled
>"Collaboration ITU-R/IEEE 802.16 on broadband wireless access":
>
> http://ieee802.org/16/liaison/docs/L80216-03_20.pdf
>
>The letter asks us to provide some material to ITU-R. I would like
>have us approve a response at Session #29. Please let me know if you
>would like to participate in drafting the content.
>
>Roger